R.L. v. Department of Education, State of Hawai'i
| R l, Howard Seth Peck and R.L. |
| Department of Education, State of Hawai'i, Christina Kishimoto and State of Hawaii, Department of Education |
| 1:2020cv00214 |
| May 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| WES REBER PORTER |
| J MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1401 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(i) by Howard Seth Peck, R.L. - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 6/29/2020. (jo) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Howard Seth Peck, R.L.. State of Hawaii, Department of Education served on 6/3/2020. (Peck, Keith) |
| Filing 10 EO: Based on counsel's letter, see ECF No. #9 , the parties have reached a settlement in this action. The Telephonic Early Settlement Conference set for 6/4/2020 and the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 7/6/2020 are VACATED. No later than 7/1/2020, the parties shall submit the appropriate dismissal documents to seabright_orders@hid.uscourts.gov. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER)(mrf) |
| Filing 9 Letter from Keith Peck addressed to Magistrate Judge Wes Reber Porter, dated May 29, 2020. (mrf) |
| Filing 8 EO: The Court will conduct the Early Settlement Conference set for 6/04/2020 at 11:00 AM before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER by telephone and will caucus with each side separately. The parties shall remain available by telephone until the Court informs the parties that the Early Settlement Conference has concluded.Counsel shall email the telephone numbers where they can be reached for the Telephonic Early Settlement Conference to Judge Porter's Courtroom Manager (mary_feria@hid.uscourts.gov) no later than May 20, 2020.Confidential Early Settlement Conference Statements shall be emailed to porter_orders@hid.uscourts.gov no later than seven days before the Telephone Early Settlement Conference.(MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER)(mrf) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Kris S. Murakami on behalf of Christina Kishimoto, State of Hawaii, Department of Education (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Murakami, Kris) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (jni) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet - Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Attachments: #1 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #2 Waiver of the Service of Summons)(jni) |
Filing 4
Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 9:00 AM on 7/6/2020 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 5/8/2020. (Attachments: #1 Memo Re: Corporate Disclosure Statements) ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURES MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT.(jni)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 20-00214 JMS-WRP on all further pleadings. (jni) |
| Filing 2 Summons (Proposed) (Peck, Keith) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Education, State of Hawai'i ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0975-2368726.), filed by R l. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Settlement Agreement, #3 Exhibit Invoice)(Peck, Keith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
