Kahapea v. Hawaii State Federal Credit Union et al
Case Number: 1:2020cv00281
Filed: August 6, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Office: Hawaii Office
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 EO: COURT ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S 8 MOTION TO RECONSIDER ACTION TO CLOSE MISCELLANEOUS CASE. Because Kahapea is proceeding pro se, his filings must be liberally construed. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam). The Motion for Reconsideration must therefore be liberally construed as also requesting a ruling on the merits of the Motion to Confirm. Kahapeas request is DENIED because it is premature.The magistrate judge will hold a scheduling conference on August 17, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. [Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference, filed 6/22/20 (dkt. no. 6).] At the scheduling conference, the magistrate judge will, among other things, set a briefing schedule and hearing date for the Motion to Confirm. This Court will consider the merits of the Motion to Confirm after the motion has been fully briefed and after any hearing is held.The Motion for Reconsideration is therefore DENIED in its entirety. (JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI), (afe)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kahapea v. Hawaii State Federal Credit Union et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?