Thomas v. City and County of Honolulu
| DEBRALYNN THOMAS |
| City and County of Honolulu and John and/or Jane Does 1-20 |
| 1:2020cv00294 |
| July 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| WES REBER PORTER |
| DERRICK K WATSON |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 EO: At the request of Eric A. Seitz and agreement by opposing counsel, the hearing on #8 Defendant City and County of Honolulu's Motion To Dismiss The Complaint set for 9/18/2020 is CONTINUED to 10/15/2020 @ 9:30 AM before Judge Derrick K. Watson. The briefing schedule for this motion is governed by the Local Rules, based on the new hearing date of 10/15/2020. (JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON)(tyk) |
| Filing 11 EO: The Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 08/31/2020 is CONTINUED to 11/3/2020 at 08:30AM before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER. The Court will be using AT&T Connect Audio Conference at 1-888-278-0296 / Access Code: 8224751. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER)(mrf) |
| Filing 10 REPORT of Planning Meeting . (Seitz, Eric) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Hearing on #8 Defendant City and County of Honolulu's Motion To Dismiss The Complaint Filed On July 1, 2020 is set for 9/18/2020 at 09:30 AM in Aha Kupono before JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON. (tyk) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Donovan Asao Odo appearing for Defendant City and County of Honolulu (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #2 Certificate of Service)(Odo, Donovan) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Debralynn Thomas. City and County of Honolulu served on 7/10/2020. (Seitz, Eric) |
| ADVISORY ENTRY. Incorrect Attorney Filer- Please be advised that Document #1 Complaint filed by Debralynn Thomas was signed by an attorney other than the one identified as the e-filer. The name of the CM/ECF User under whose login and password the document is being electronically filed must correspond to the signature of the attorney signing the CM/ECF filed document. The filing party shall use its discretion should they feel the necessity to re-submit corrected filings. (emt, ) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (jni) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet - Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Attachments: #1 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #2 Waiver of the Service of Summons)(jni) |
Filing 4
Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 9:00 AM on 8/31/2020 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 7/1/2020. (Attachments: #1 Memo Re: Corporate Disclosure Statements) ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURES MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT.(jni)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 20-00294 DKW-WRP on all further pleadings. (jni) |
| Filing 2 Summons (Proposed) (Seitz, Eric) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0975-2390998.), filed by DEBRALYNN THOMAS. (Attachments: #1 Demand for Jury Trial, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Seitz, Eric) Modified on 7/6/2020 This document is electronically signed by Gina Szeto-Wong, Esq. (emt, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
