Sandeen v. Barr et al
Petitioner: Andrew A. Sandeen
Respondent: United States of America, Bureau of Prisons Honolulu Federal Detention Center, United States Marshal Service, US Attorney General William Barr and Bureau of Prisons/FDC Honolulu
Case Number: 1:2020cv00505
Filed: November 23, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Presiding Judge: JILL A OTAKE
Referring Judge: J MICHAEL SEABRIGHT
2 Judge: ROM TRADER
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 2, 2020 Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered on 12/2/2020 pursuant to ECF No. #5 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AND DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL. (emt, )
December 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AND DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL re #1 , #2 , #3 - Signed by JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE on 12/2/2020. For the reasons stated herein, the Court DISMISSES the Petition. ECF No. 1. In light of the dismissal of the Petition, Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Motion to Appoint Counsel are DENIED as moot. ECF Nos. 2, 3. (emt, )
December 2, 2020 COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of #5 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AND DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL and #6 Clerk's Judgment have been served by First Class Mail to Andrew A. Sandeen at the address of record on December 2, 2020. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (emt, )
November 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 11/30/2020. Please reflect new case number CV 20-00505 JAO-RT on all further pleadings . (emt, )
November 30, 2020 COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of #4 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE shall be served by First Class Mail to Andrew A. Sandeen at the address of record on December 1, 2020. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (emt, )
November 27, 2020 COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - filed copies of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, and #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel have been served by First Class Mail to Andrew Sandeen at the address of record on November 27, 2020. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (jo)
November 23, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel For Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 U.S.C. 2241, 2243 FOR GOOD CAUSE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1) AND CRIMlNAL JUSTICE ACT 18 U.S.C. 3006(a)(2)(B) - filed by Petitioner Andrew A. Sandeen Note: This document was also included as Exhibit I in ECF #1 (jo)
November 23, 2020 Filing 2 APPLICATION To Proceed in Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner - filed by Petitioner Andrew A. Sandeen Note: This document was also included as Exhibit H in ECF #1 (jo)
November 23, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2241 - filed by Andrew A. Sandeen (Attachments: #1 Memorandum In Support of Petition For Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 U.S.C. 2241, 2243, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Transmittal Letter, #12 Transmittal Envelope) (jo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sandeen v. Barr et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bureau of Prisons Honolulu Federal Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States Marshal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: US Attorney General William Barr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bureau of Prisons/FDC Honolulu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Andrew A. Sandeen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?