Prowse v. Pekoske
| Heather Prowse |
| David Pekoske |
| 1:2021cv00057 |
| January 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| ALAN C KAY |
| WES REBER PORTER |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
EO: The Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 03/22/2021 is CONTINUED to 04/26/2021 at 8:45 a.m. before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER via AT&T Connect Audio Conference at 1-888-278-0296 / Access Code: 8224751. Plaintiff shall notify Defendants. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER)(jp)
|
|
ADVISORY ENTRY-Incorrect Event- Please be advised that an incorrect filing event was selected for docket entry #7 Certificate of Service. The docket text has been modified. For the filing party's future reference, a helpful tool in determining the correct filing event is the "SEARCH" option located on the CM/ECF tool bar. A text window will appear wherein the filer may type in the word that describes the filing. No further action is necessary. (jni)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Returned Executed. Summons served upon Financial Litigation Agent, on behalf of David Pekoske, Acting Secretary, U.S. Dept of Homeland Security on 1/25/2021.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Heather Prowse (Barbee, Daphne) Docket Text Modified on 1/28/2021 (jni).
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to David Pekoske, Acting Secretary of U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (jni)
|
|
Filing 5
CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet - Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Attachments: #1 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #2 Waiver of the Service of Summons)(jni)
|
|
Filing 4
Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 9:00AM on 3/22/2021 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 1/22/2021. (Attachments: #1 Memo Re: Corporate Disclosures) ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURES MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT.(jni)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 21-00057 ACK-WRP on all further pleadings. (emt, )
|
|
Filing 2
Summons (Proposed) (Barbee, Daphne)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Jury Demand against David Pekoske ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0975-2475422.), filed by Heather Prowse. (Attachments: #1 Jury Demand)(Barbee, Daphne) Modified on 1/22/2021 (emt, ).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Prowse v. Pekoske | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: David Pekoske | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Heather Prowse | |
| Represented By: | Daphne E. Barbee |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
