Yoshihiro et al v. Crane Company
Grace Yoshihiro and Dawn Mashima |
Crane Company |
Keith Hunter |
1:2021cv00119 |
March 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
LESLIE E KOBAYASHI |
WES REBER PORTER |
P.I. : Asbestos |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Dawn Mashima, Grace Yoshihiro Certificate of Service (Re: Plaintiffs First Request for Production of Documents to Defendant Crane Company, dated April 22, 2021) (DeRobertis, L.) |
Filing 11 Scheduling Conference Statement Defendant Crane Co.'s Rule 16 Scheduling Conference Statement. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Harstad, William) |
Filing 10 ORDER APPOINTING MEDIATOR - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER on 3/11/2021. Keith Hunter added as Mediator. The Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for April 5, 2021 is VACATED and will be reset after mediation concludes. (emt, ) |
Filing 9 REPORT of Planning Meeting (Letter addressed to Magistrate Judge Wes Reber Porter from L. Richard DeRobertis, Esq., dated March 9, 2021 Re: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference scheduled for April 5, 2021). (DeRobertis, L.) |
Filing 8 Defendant Crane Co.'s Answer to Plaintiffs' Complaint Filed December 10, 2020 ANSWER to Complaint by Crane Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Harstad, William) |
Filing 7 TRANSMITTAL of DOCUMENTS from the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, State of Hawaii, 1CCV200001646. (Attachments: #1 Circuit Court Clerk's Certificate Regarding Judiciary Information Management System (JIMS), #2 Case Detail Docket List) (emt, ) |
Filing 6 Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:00AM on 4/5/2021 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 3/2/2021. (Attachments: #1 Memo from Clerk Re: Corporate Disclosures) ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURES MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT. (emt, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 21-00119 LEK-WRP on all further pleadings. (emt, ) |
Filing 4 CIVIL Cover Sheet by Crane Company. (Harstad, William) |
Filing 3 SUPPLEMENT re #2 Supplement, filed by Crane Company, #1 Notice of Removal,, filed by Crane Company by Crane Company . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 4a - Forman Affidavit, Ex. A, A-5, A-7, #2 Exhibit 4b - Forman,Samuel.Affidavit. Ex. A-16, A-19, A-24, A-26, A-27, #3 Exhibit 5 - State Court Notice of Notice of Removal, #4 Certificate of Service)(Harstad, William) |
Filing 2 SUPPLEMENT re #1 Notice of Removal,, filed by Crane Company by Crane Company . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 3b - Sargent,David.Affidavit. Ex. G, H, J, K, L, #2 Exhibit 3c - Sargent,David.Affidavit. Ex. N, O, P, #3 Exhibit 3d - Sargent,David.Affidavit. Ex. R, T, U)(Harstad, William) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Crane Company Defendant Crane Co.'s Notice of Removal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1442 & 1446; Declaration of William M. Harstad; Exhibits "1"-"5"; Certificate of Service from Circuit Court of the First Circuit, case number 1CCV-20-0001646. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0975-2491993), filed by Crane Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of William M. Harstad, #2 Exhibit 1 - Complaint, #3 Exhibit 2 - Friemoth Affidavit, Ex. A, B, C, D, #4 Exhibit 3a - Ex. 3a - Sargent,David.Affidavit, Ex. A, A-1, B, D)(Harstad, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.