Grandinetti v. Honolulu Police Department et al
| Francis Grandinetti |
| Max N. Otani, DPS-Hawaii, Tommy Johnson, Chief Susan Ballard, Honolulu Police Department and County of Hawaii Police Department |
| Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto |
| 1:2021cv00135 |
| March 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| KENNETH J MANSFIELD |
| DERRICK K WATSON |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 USCA Case Number 21-15728 for #4 Notice of Appeal filed by Francis Grandinetti, #5 Subsequent Notice of Appeal filed by Francis Grandinetti. This appeal is subject to a pre-filing review order entered in case number 06-80108. The appeal will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be permitted to proceed. Do not file a brief until/unless directed by the Court to do so. Briefing schedule will be set by future court order only if the Court determines that the appeal should be allowed to proceed. (emt, )COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - Francis Grandinetti, II served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on April 26, 2021. A filed copy of the Consolidated Notice of Appeal, ECF No. #5 , shall be included in the mailing to Plaintiff. [ |
| Filing 5 Subsequent NOTICE OF APPEAL ("Consolidated Appeals") re #2 , #3 - by Francis Grandinetti. Filing fee $ DUE. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Documentation)(emt, ) |
| Filing 4 Preliminary Injunction NOTICE OF APPEAL re #2 , #3 - by Francis Grandinetti. Filing fee $ DUE. USCA NO. 21-15728. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Documentation)(emt, ) Modified on 4/26/2021 (emt, ). |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered on 3/17/2021 pursuant to ECF No. #2 DISMISSAL ORDER. (emt, )COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - Francis Grandinetti served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on March 17, 2021. |
Filing 2
DISMISSAL ORDER re #1 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 3/17/2021. The Court construes Grandinetti's filing of this action without paying the civil filing fee as an informal request to proceed in forma pauperis. So construed, the request is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Young v. Peterson, 548 F. App'x 479, 480 (9th Cir. 2013) (affirming denial of application to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff "failed to allege sufficient facts to show that he was under an imminent danger of serious physical injury when he lodged his complaint" (citations omitted)); Reberger v. Baker, 657 F. App'x 681, 684 (9th Cir. 2016) ("[Plaintiff's] allegations... are too vague and speculative to invoke the exception to the three-strikes rule."). This does not prevent Grandinetti from raising his claims in a new action with concurrent payment of the civil filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate this case. The Court will take no action on documents filed herein beyond processing a notice of appeal. (emt, )COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - Francis Grandinetti served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on March 17, 2021.
|
| Filing 1 Federal COMPLAINT and Lawsuit, Fed.R.Civ.P. 65, TRO Application, etc. against All Defendants - filed by Francis Grandinetti. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Documentation)(emt, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/16/2021: #2 (unredacted) Complaint) (emt, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
