McNeil v. United States of America
| Kenneth Charles McNeil |
| United States of America |
| 1:2021cv00212 |
| April 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| ROM TRADER |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Petitioner's SUPPLEMENTAL Exhibits re: #9 - filed by Kenneth Charles McNeil (CR 02-00547 SOM; CV 21-00212 SOM-RT) (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (jo)
|
|
Filing 9
Petitioner's REPLY to Government's Memorandum - filed by Kenneth Charles McNeil (CR 02-00547 SOM; CV 21-00212 SOM-RT) (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (jo)
|
|
Filing 8
EO: The court denies Mr. McNeil's motion regarding amicus briefs. Mr. McNeil appears to assume that this court should affirmatively invite amicus briefs. That is not the court's practice. If someone interested in filing an amicus brief were to move for leave to do so, the court would consider that motion. The court's present expectation, however, is that it will be able to decide the coram nobis motion based on what Mr. McNeil and the United States submit. re #7 . (JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY)(cib)
|
|
COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of 8 Link has been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record on Kenneth Charles McNeil. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (cib)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION Asking the Court to Request Amicus Participation - filed by Kenneth Charles McNeil (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (CR 02-00547 SOM; CV 21-00212 SOM-RT)(jo)
|
|
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM in Opposition by USA as to Kenneth Charles McNeil re #1 Petition For Writ Of Error Coram Nobis (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Certificate of Service) (jo)
|
|
ADVISORY ENTRY: The Clerk's Office has entered ECF #11 MEMORANDUM in Opposition by USA in the instant case. Pursuant to ECF 5 - "All docket entries relative to the Coram Nobis Petition will be entered in both cases: CR 02-00547 SOM and CV 21-00212 SOM-RT..." All further filings shall be entered in both cases. (jo)
|
|
Filing 6
EO: The court denies the motion to stay and instead grants the alternative motion to add the motion for determination of applicable law to the coram nobis petition. The government may respond to both the motion for determination of applicable law and to the coram nobis petition in a single memorandum of no more than 9000 words no later than June 7, 2021. Mr. McNeil may file a single optional reply memorandum of no more than 4500 words by June 21, 2021. At this time, the court sets a hearing to be held by videoconference on the matter for July 12, 2021 at 11:00 a.m., but the court reserves the right, after reviewing the briefs, to take the matter off the hearing calendar and to decide the matter based on the briefs. If the court proceeds with a hearing, directions for joining by video will be provided at a later date. re #3 , #4 . (JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY)(cib)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil Case Number CV 21-00212 SOM-RT on all further pleadings. All docket entries relative to the Coram Nobis Petition will be entered in both cases: CR 02-00547 SOM and CV 21-00212 SOM-RT. Please reflect the two case numbers on all further filings. (jo)
|
|
COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of 6 has been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record on Kenneth Charles McNeil. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (cib)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION Stay Coram Nobis Proceedings Until Disposition of Petitioner's Motion For Determination of Applicable Law or in the alternative, MOTION to Add Petitioner's Motion For Determination to Petitioner's Petition For Writ of Coram Nobis re #1 , #3 - filed by Kenneth Charles McNeil (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (jo)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Determination of Applicable Law re #1 Petition For Writ of Error Coram Nobis - filed by Kenneth Charles McNeil (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (jo)
|
|
Filing 2
EXHIBITS to #1 Petition For Writ of Error Coram Nobis - filed by Kenneth Charles McNeil (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (jo)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS - filed by Kenneth Charles McNeil (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope) (jo)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McNeil v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kenneth Charles McNeil | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Marshall H Silverberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
