Pitts v. Harrington et al
| Joseph Pitts |
| Scott Harrington and UTM Monica Chun |
| Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington |
| 1:2021cv00249 |
| May 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| KENNETH J MANSFIELD |
| DERRICK K WATSON |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BY A PRISONER re #2 - Signed by JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 5/27/2021. (emt, )COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - Joseph Pitts shall be served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on May 28, 2021. Additionally, a copy of this order shall be served by First Class Mail to the Warden and Financial Office of Halawa Correctional Facility on May 28, 2021. The order has been served electronically to DPS Litigation Coordinators Shelley Nobriga Harrington, Esq., Laurie Nadamoto, Esq., and the Financial Department for the District of Hawaii.
|
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner - by Plaintiff Joseph Pitts. (emt, ) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants - filed by Joseph Pitts. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit SC1, #2 Mailing Documentation)(emt, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
