Mizuno v. Wyndham Destinations, Inc.
Plaintiff: Miyoko Mizuno
Defendant: Wyndham Destinations, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv00391
Filed: September 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Presiding Judge: LESLIE E KOBAYASHI
Referring Judge: WES REBER PORTER
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered on 10/19/2021 pursuant to ECF Nos. #8 and #10 . (eta)COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Miyoko Mizuno shall be served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on October 19, 2021.
October 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION re #8 - Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 10/19/2021. (eta)COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Miyoko Mizuno served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on October 19, 2021.
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Case Reassignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 21-00391 LEK-WRP on all further pleadings. (eta)COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Miyoko Mizuno shall be served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on September 29, 2021.
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT ; FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION THAT THE DISTRICT COURT GRANT PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES; DISMISS THE COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND DENY PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL re #1 , #3 , #4 - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER on 9/28/2021. Because full consent of the parties is lacking under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the Clerk of Court is directed to REASSIGN this case to a district judge. The Court FINDS AND RECOMMENDS that the district court: 1) GRANT Plaintiff's Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees; 2) DISMISS Plaintiff's Complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff litigating the First Action, Mizuno v. Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc., 21-cv-00379-JAO-KJM; 3) DENY Plaintiff's Request for Appointment of Counsel and accompanying request for an interpreter; and 4) INSTRUCT Plaintiff to provide a copy of the district court's adoption of any of these Findings and Recommendations to her counsel in the First Action. IT IS SO FOUND AND RECOMMENDED. (eta)COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Miyoko Mizuno shall be served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on September 29, 2021.
September 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Consent Election Form (jo)
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. YOU MUST COMPLETE AND FILE THE ATTACHED ELECTION FORM. FILING INSTRUCTIONS ATTACHED. While the decision to consent or not to consent to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge is entirely voluntarily, the duty to respond to this notice is mandatory. Each party must indicate consent or decline to consent by completing the attached Election Form and filing it with the court no later than twenty-one (21) days after entry of appearance. In the event a dispositive motion is filed prior to the date on which the submission of the Election Form is required, the parties must return the completed Election Form within seven (7) calendar days after the motion is filed. (Attachments: #1 Election Form )(emt, )
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:00AM on 11/15/2021 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 9/16/2021. (Attachments: #1 Memo from Clerk Re: Corporate Disclosures)(emt, )
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REQUEST for Appointment of Counsel Under the Civil Rights Act of 1964; 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(1)(B); Declaration in Support of Request - by Plaintiff Miyoko Mizuno (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Request for Japanese interpreter for future court hearing(s))(emt, )
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs - by Plaintiff Miyoko Mizuno (emt, )
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet - by Miyoko Mizuno. (emt, )
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT against Wyndham Destinations, Inc. - filed by Miyoko Mizuno. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List (brief summary of Exhibits A-J), #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K)(emt, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mizuno v. Wyndham Destinations, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Miyoko Mizuno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wyndham Destinations, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?