Troiano v. United States of America
| James Troiano |
| United States of America |
| 1:2022cv00101 |
| March 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| Hawaii Office |
| HELEN GILLMOR |
| WES REBER PORTER |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered 3/16/2022 pursuant to ECF #3 ORDER REFERRING PETITIONER JAMES TROIANO'S MOTION (ECF No. 369) TO THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR 2255(h) CERTIFICATION (jo) |
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING PETITIONER JAMES TROIANO'S MOTION (ECF No. 369) TO THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR 2255(h) CERTIFICATION re: #1 as to (1) James Troiano - Signed by SENIOR JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 3/16/2022. Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Rule 22-3(a), the Court REFERS Petitioner's MOTION (ECF No. 369) to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for consideration as an application for leave to file a second or successive habeas petition. The case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THE CASE. The case will be reopened if the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals subsequently authorizes the filing of Petitioner's second or successive Section 2255 habeas petition with this Court. (jo) COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - James Troiano will be served by First Class Mail on March 17, 2022 to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Copies of ECF Nos. #1 and 2 were also included in this mailing. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals received this filing electronically.
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil Case Number CV 22-00101 HG-WRP on all further pleadings. All docket entries relative to the 28:2255 Motion will be entered in the Criminal Case: CR 05-00261 HG-1. Please reflect the two case numbers: CR 05-00261 HG-1 and CV 22-00101 HG-WRP on all further filings. (jo) |
| COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - a copy of ECF No. #4 Clerk's Judgment will be served by First Class Mail to James Troiano at the address of record on March 17, 2022. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (jo) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Reconsideration - filed by James Troiano (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service, #2 Mailing Envelope) (jo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Troiano v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: James Troiano | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Marshall H Silverberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
