Jimenez-Ramirez v. Derr
| Rodrigo Jimenez-Ramirez |
| Ms. Estella Derr |
| 1:2022cv00139 |
| April 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| JILL A OTAKE |
| ROM TRADER |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered on 5/3/2022 pursuant to ECF No. #5 DISMISSAL ORDER. (jni) |
Filing 5
DISMISSAL ORDER re #1 - Signed by JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE on 5/3/2022. (1) The Petition under 28 U.S.C. 2241 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice, but without leave to amend. (2) To the extent Jimenez-Ramirez has conditions of confinement claims that do not impact the fact or duration of his confinement, those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice to raising them in a separate action. (3) The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment and close the case.(jni)
|
| COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of #5 Dismissal Order, and #6 Clerk's Judgment shall be served by First Class Mail to Rodrigo Jimenez-Ramirez at the address of record on 5/3/2022. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (jni) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number HI032532 re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (jni) |
| Filing 3 EO: The parties are directed to review the General Civil Case Procedures Before Judge Otake posted on the court's website and are expected to comply with the most recent version that is posted. (JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE)(tl)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF) |
|
Filing 2
HABEAS DEFICIENCY ORDER re #1 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 4/1/2022. (jni)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C 2241 - filed by Rodrigo Jimenez-Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(jni) |
| COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a file-stamped copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Habeas Deficiency Order was served by First Class Mail to Rodrigo Jimenez-Ramirez at the address of record on 4/1/2022. An Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner, along with instructions, was included in the mailing to Petitioner. (jni) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jimenez-Ramirez v. Derr | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Rodrigo Jimenez-Ramirez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Ms. Estella Derr | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
