Pectol et al v. Pectol et al
| Michael Pectol, Victims Numbered 1, 2, and 3 and 4 Individuals Comprise Filing Plaintiffs |
| Brent Pectol, Kathryn Pectol, Municipal, County, and State Facilitators of Abducted Minor Children Listed in Filings in U.S.D.C. Locations and United States Negligent Authorities |
| 1:2022cv00169 |
| April 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| KENNETH J MANSFIELD |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered on 6/8/2022 pursuant to #4 ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT APPLICATIONS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. (cib)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF)
|
|
Filing 9
EO: Given the lack of an operative pleading, the Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference previously set for June 13, 2022 IS CONTINUED TO June 27, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD. In accordance with the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii's latest Temporary General Order Regarding District of Hawaii Response to COVID-19 Emergency and the Order Authorizing the Use of Telephonic and Video Hearings, due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and public health emergency, including the anticipated long term need to maintain certain social distancing and other measures intended to protect the public, court employees, and counsel from being exposed to the COVID-19 virus, while at the same time regulating civil matters in a manner consistent with equity and fairness, the hearing will be held telephonically. Parties are to participate via telephone through our AT&T Service. Call-in information for this conference is below. Parties must connect to the conference at least five (5) minutes prior to the scheduled start time of the hearing.Dial in number is 1-877-848-7030Access Code is 2123668 (MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD)(bbb)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF)
|
|
Filing 8
Email Address Update in Cases - by Michael Pectol (jo)
|
|
Filing 7
EO: On April 14, 2022, Plaintiff Michael Pectol filed the Complaint in this matter along with an Application to Proceed Without Paying Fees or Costs ("IFP Application"). See ECF Nos. #1 and #2 . The court screened the Complaint and dismissed it for failing to plead a viable claim supported by factual allegations. The court denied the IFP Application as moot. See ECF No. #4 . The court gave Plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint and a new IFP Application (or to pay the applicable filing fee) no later than May 13, 2022. Id. This means that Plaintiff has permission to file a new complaint, called an "Amended Complaint." The court provided Plaintiff with guidance with respect to the requirements of a Complaint. Id. Shortly after the court filed its order, Plaintiff filed a "Motion for: Courtroom hearing/Expedited" and a notice. See ECF No. #5 and #6 . To the extent Plaintiff requests a hearing, that motion is denied, as there is currently no Complaint before this court that would support any relief. It appears from Plaintiff's motion that he misunderstands the process before this court. Plaintiff has come to this court asking for relief. However, to meet his burden to demonstrate entitlement to any relief, Plaintiff cannot simply reference other unidentified case files before other courts and claim discrimination. It is Plaintiff's burden to provide this court with any documents Plaintiff wishes this court to review and a clear explanation as to why he is entitled to relief. Additionally, when ruling on motions, judges in this court do not provide parties with identification nor proof of reviewing the record. This court will take no action on this case until an Amended Complaint is filed. (JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY)(cib)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF)
|
|
COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of 7 EO has been served by EMAIL to Plaintiff Michael Pectol. Hard copy of 7 EO placed in envelope for outgoing mail at the clerk's office counter for Plaintiff Pectol. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (cib)
|
|
Filing 6
To: Person Whom Claims to be a Judge, Didn't Provide I.D. and Provided No Evidence of Reviewing Documents or Context For Legal Reference: Attention and Take Notice that the Negligence of this Court to Provide Discovery Documents: Is Evidentiary of Court and Judicial Authority Discrimination and Prohibition of Documents... - by Plaintiff Michael Pectol (jo)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for: Courtroom Hearing/Expidited [sic] Docket Time - by Plaintiff Michael Pectol (jo)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT; ORDER DENYING AS MOOT APPLICATIONS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS re #1 , #2 - Signed by JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY on 4/18/2022. The Complaint is dismissed, and the IFP Application is denied as moot. The court grants Plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint that states a viable claim no later than May 13, 2022. Plaintiff may submit another IFP Application at that time. Failure to file an Amended Complaint by May 13, 2022, as well as to pay the applicable filing fee or submit a new IFP Application, will result in the automatic dismissal of this action.(cib)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF)
|
|
COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of #4 Order, has been served by EMAIL to Plaintiff Michael Pectol. Hard copy of #4 Order, AO 245 and Pro Se 1 Forms placed in envelope for outgoing mail at the clerk's office counter for Plaintiff Pectol. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (cib)
|
|
Filing 3
Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference for 09:30 AM on 6/13/2022 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 4/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memo from Clerk Re: Corporate Disclosures) (jo)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form) - by Plaintiff Michael Pectol (jo)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT FILING; CRIMINAL AND CIVIL against All Defendants - filed by Michael Pectol (jo)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
