Wailehua v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Plaintiff: Kami Wailehua
Defendant: UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00280
Filed: June 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Presiding Judge: LESLIE E KOBAYASHI
Referring Judge: KENNETH J MANSFIELD
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT FILED ON JUNE 22, 2022 AND ORDER - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD on 8/10/2022. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. answer due 9/12/2022. (eta)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent United Parcel Service of America, Inc., Other Affiliate United Parcel Service, Inc. for UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc... (Kawai, Kendra)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by David Elliot Gonzalez on behalf of UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. on behalf of UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.. (Gonzalez, David)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert S. Katz on behalf of UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. on behalf of UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.. (Katz, Robert)
August 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Kendra K. Kawai on behalf of UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. on behalf of UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.. (Kawai, Kendra)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 EO: In light of the #7 Letter request, the Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference previously set for August 22, 2022 IS CONTINUED TO October 3, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD. Scheduling conference statements are now due by September 26, 2022.In accordance with the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii's latest Temporary General Order Regarding District of Hawaii Response to COVID-19 Emergency and the Order Authorizing the Use of Telephonic and Video Hearings, due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and public health emergency, including the anticipated long term need to maintain certain social distancing and other measures intended to protect the public, court employees, and counsel from being exposed to the COVID-19 virus, while at the same time regulating civil matters in a manner consistent with equity and fairness, the hearing will be held telephonically. Parties are to participate via telephone through our NEW ZOOM Teleconference. Call-in information for this conference is below. Parties must connect to the conference at least five (5) minutes prior to the scheduled start time of the hearing.Dial in number is 1-833-568-8864Access Code: 160 8983 1896 (MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD)(bbb)
August 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 LETTER OF REQUEST from Michael Healy dated August 4, 2022 regarding the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference. (bbb)
July 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kami Wailehua. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. served on 7/21/2022. (Brower, Charles)
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Summons Issued as to UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. (jni)
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet - Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Attachments: #1 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #2 Waiver of the Service of Summons)(jni)
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:30AM on 8/22/2022 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 6/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memo Re: Corporate Disclosures) ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURES MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT.(jni)
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 22-00280 LEK-KJM on all further pleadings. (jni)
June 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT ; Jury Demand against UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. Kami Wailehua ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AHIDC-2696960.), filed by Kami Wailehua. (Attachments: #1 Jury Demand, #2 (Proposed) Summons, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brower, Charles) Modified on 6/22/2022 (jni) Modified on 6/23/2022 (eta).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wailehua v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kami Wailehua
Represented By: Michael P. Healy
Represented By: Charles H. Brower
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Robert S. Katz
Represented By: David Elliot Gonzalez
Represented By: Kendra K. Kawai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?