J.D. v. Department of Education, State of Hawaii
| J.D. |
| Department of Education, State of Hawaii and Keith T. Hayashi |
| 1:2022cv00300 |
| July 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| J MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
| ROM TRADER |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 20 U.S.C. ยง 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet - Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Attachments: #1 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #2 Waiver of the Service of Summons)(jni) |
Filing 3
Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:00AM on 9/12/2022 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 7/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memo Re: Corporate Disclosures) ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURES MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT.(jni)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 22-00300 JMS-RT on all further pleadings. (jni) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Education, State of Hawaii ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AHIDC-2704032.), filed by M D.(Peck, Keith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
