Securities and Exchange Commission v. Semisub, Inc. et al
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Semisub, Inc., Curtiss Edward Jackson and Jamey Denise Jackson |
| 1:2022cv00349 |
| August 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| KENNETH J MANSFIELD |
| SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 42
RESPONSE re #28 Objection by Defendant Jamey Denise Jackson to Magistrate's Ruling and Motion for Review by Assigned United States District Court Judge filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Costello, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 41
FIRST STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME BETWEEN SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION AND DEFENDANTS SEMISUB, INC. AND CURTISS EDWARD JACKSON. Signed by SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY. (cib)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF)
|
|
COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of #41 Stipulation has been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record on Jamey Denise Jackson. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (cib)
|
|
Filing 40
AMENDED EO: On September 23, 2022, pro se Defendant Denise Jamey Jackson ("Defendant Jackson") filed a 33 Motion to Answer to Strike, in which Defendant Jackson requests an extension of the deadline to respond to 20 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Strike. Defendant Jackson asks the Court to extend the deadline until after ruling on Defendant Jackson's motion for appointment of counsel. Although the Court has already denied Defendant Jackson's requests for appointment of counsel, the Court GRANTS the 33 Motion to Answer to Strike to the extent Defendant Jackson seeks an extension.Defendant Jackson's opposition to 20 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Strike must be filed no later than 4 p.m. HST on 10/06/2022. This new opposition deadline pertains only to Defendant Jackson. If no opposition is filed by that date and time, the court may grant all or part of the motion. If any defendant timely files an opposition, Plaintiff may file an optional reply brief no later than 4 p.m. on 10/20/2022. Each party may file a single document opposing or replying to any opposition filed. If any document is filed without conforming to any applicable court order or court rule, the court may decline to consider the document. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD on 09/28/2022. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD)(kjm2)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF)
|
|
Filing 39
STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendants to File Response to Plaintiff's Second Motion to Strike Defendants' Answer re #20 by Curtiss Edward Jackson, Semisub, Inc. (Elliot, Caroline) Modified on 9/28/2022 (jni)
|
|
Filing 38
STATEMENT of No Opposition re #31 MOTION For Entry of Fed R Evid 502 Order and Protective Order to Govern PII filed by Curtiss Edward Jackson, Semisub, Inc.. (Elliot, Caroline)
|
|
Filing 37
Scheduling Conference Statement by Curtiss Edward Jackson, Semisub, Inc.. (Elliot, Caroline)
|
|
Filing 36
EO: The Court finds #31 Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Fed. R. Evid. 502 Order and for Protective Order suitable for disposition without a hearing pursuant to Rule 7.1(c) of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. Any oppositions must be filed by 10/07/2022. Plaintiff may not file a reply. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD)(kjm2)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF)
|
|
Filing 35
EO: On September 23, 2022, pro se Defendant Denise Jamey Jackson ("Defendant Jackson") filed a #33 Motion to Answer to Strike, in which Defendant Jackson requests an extension of the deadline to respond to #20 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Strike. Defendant Jackson asks the Court to extend the deadline until after ruling on Defendant Jackson's motion for appointment of counsel. Although the Court has already denied Defendant Jackson's requests for appointment of counsel, the Court GRANTS the #33 Motion to Answer to Strike to the extent Defendant Jackson seeks an extension. Defendant Jackson's opposition to #20 Plaintiff's Second Motion to Strike must be filed no later than 4 p.m. HST on 10/06/2023. This new opposition deadline pertains only to Defendant Jackson. If no opposition is filed by that date and time, the court may grant all or part of the motion. If any defendant timely files an opposition, Plaintiff may file an optional reply brief no later than 4 p.m. on 10/20/2022. Each party may file a single document opposing or replying to any opposition filed. If any document is filed without conforming to any applicable court order or court rule, the court may decline to consider the document. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD on 09/26/2022. (kjm2)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF)
|
|
Filing 34
Scheduling Conference Statement by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Costello, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 33
REQUEST for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Strike; Certificate of Service re #20 - by Defendant Jamey Denise Jackson (jni)
|
|
Filing 32
EO: For good cause shown, and given the lack of any opposition, the Court GRANTS the #25 Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Answer. Defendants SemiSub, Inc. and Curtiss Edward Jackson may file an amended answer by 10/10/2022. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD on 09/22/2022. (kjm2)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF)
|
|
Filing 31
MOTION For Entry of Fed R Evid 502 Order and Protective Order to Govern PII Patrick R. Costello appearing for Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Costello, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 30
STATEMENT of No Opposition re #25 First MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #15 Answer to Complaint filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Costello, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 29
EO: The Court finds the #25 Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Answer suitable for disposition without a hearing pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c). Plaintiff shall file a response by 09/28/2022. Defendants may not file a reply. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD)(kjm2)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF)
|
|
Filing 28
OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE'S RULING AND MOTION FOR REVIEW BY US DISTRICT COURT JUDGE re 24 Order, 27 Order - filed by Jamey Denise Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(jni)
|
|
Filing 27
EO: On September 15, 2022, Defendant Jackson filed a #23 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and for the Appointment of Counsel for Jamey Denise Jackson ("09/15/2022 Motion"). On September 19, 2022, the Court issued an 24 entering order denying the 09/15/2022 Motion ("09/19/2022 EO"). That same day, Defendant Jackson filed an #26 Amended Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and for the Appointment of Counsel for Jamey Denise Jackson ("Amended Motion"). The Court has reviewed the Amended Motion and finds that it does not present exceptional circumstances to warrant appointment of pro bono counsel or otherwise alter the Court's analysis in the 09/19/2022 EO. The Court thus DENIES the #26 Amended Motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD on 09/20/2022. (kjm2)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF)
|
|
Filing 26
AMENDMENT TO MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT JAMEY DENISE JACKSON - by Defendant Jamey Denise Jackson (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(jni)
|
|
Filing 25
First MOTION for Extension of Time to Amend #15 Answer to Complaint Caroline Elliot appearing for Defendants Curtiss Edward Jackson, Semisub, Inc. (Elliot, Caroline)
|
|
Filing 24
EO: On September 15, 2022, Defendant Jamey Denise Jackson ("Defendant Jackson") filed a #23 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and for the Appointment of Counsel for Defendant Jamey Denise Jackson ("Motion"). Defendant Jackson asks the Court to appoint her pro bono counsel.There is no constitutional right to counsel in a civil case. See Lassiter v. Dept of Soc. Serv., 452 U.S. 18, 25 (1981). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1), a district court has discretion to request an attorney to represent an indigent litigant in "exceptional circumstances." See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); see also Jenkins v. Perry, 592 Fed. Appx. 597, 598 (9th Cir. 2015) (reviewing district court's denial of appointment of counsel for abuse of discretion). After carefully reviewing the record in this case, the Court finds that exceptional circumstances do not exist at this time to warrant appointment of pro bono counsel to Defendant Jackson under 1915(e)(1). There is nothing in the record demonstrating that Defendant Jackson is likely to prevail on the merits. In addition, Defendant Jackson's filings indicate that she is able to articulate her arguments and defenses at this early stage in the litigation. The Court thus DENIES the Motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD on 09/19/2022. (kjm2)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF)
|
|
Filing 23
MOTION to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and for Appointment of Counsel for Defendant Jamey Denise Jackson - by Jamey Denise Jackson (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(jni)
|
|
Filing 22
REPORT of Planning Meeting (Joint) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and LR26.1. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Costello, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 21
EO: The Motion to Strike Answer, ECF No. #17 , is denied as moot given Defendant Jamey Denise Jacksons filing of an Amended Answer. On September 9, 2022, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filed a motion to strike the answers or amended answers of Defendants, at least in part. See ECF No. #20 . This court will handle that motion on a nonhearing basis. If any Defendant opposes the motion to strike, a written Opposition must be filed no later than 4 pm Hawaii time on September 30, 2022. If no Opposition if filed by that date and time, the court may grant all or part of the motion. If any Defendant timely files an Opposition, Plaintiff SEC may file an optional Reply brief no later than 4 pm Hawaii time on October 14, 2022. Each party may file a single document opposing or replying to any opposition filed. If any document is filed without conforming to any applicable court order or court rule, the court may decline to consider the document. (JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY)(cib)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF)
|
|
Filing 20
Second MOTION to Strike #18 Amended Answer to Complaint, #15 Answer to Complaint Patrick R. Costello appearing for Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Declaration of Patrick R. Costello, #3 Exhibit 1 to Declaration, #4 Exhibit 2 to Declaration, #5 Certificate of Service)(Costello, Patrick)
|
|
COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of 21 EO has been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record on Jamey Denise Jackson. Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically at the e-mail address listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). (cib)
|
|
Filing 19
EO: On August 30, 2022, Defendant Jamey Denise Jackson filed an answer to the Complaint on behalf of herself and Defendant Semisub, Inc. See ECF No. 16. On September 6, 2022, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filed a motion to strike that Answer. See ECF No. 17. This court will handle that motion on a nonhearing basis. If Defendant opposes the motion to strike, a written Opposition must be filed no later than 4 pm Hawaii time on September 20, 2022. If no Opposition if filed by that date and time, the court may grant all or part of the motion. If Defendant Jackson timely files an Opposition, Plaintiff SEC may file an optional Reply brief no later than 4 pm Hawaii time on September 27, 2022. (JUDGE SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY)(tl)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF)
|
|
Filing 18
AMENDED ANSWER OF JAMEY DENISE JACKSON re: #1 Complaint - by Jamey Denise Jackson (jo)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION to Strike #16 Answer to Complaint Patrick R. Costello appearing for Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 Declaration of Patrick R. Costello, #3 Exhibit 1 to Declaration, #4 Certificate of Service)(Costello, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 16
ANSWER to #1 Complaint - by Jamey Denise Jackson.(eta)
|
|
Filing 15
ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Curtiss Edward Jackson, Semisub, Inc..(Broaddus, Jody)
|
|
Filing 14
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Securities and Exchange Commission. Jamey Denise Jackson served on 8/17/2022. (Costello, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 13
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Securities and Exchange Commission. Curtiss Edward Jackson served on 8/7/2022. (Costello, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 12
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Securities and Exchange Commission. Semisub, Inc. served on 8/8/2022. (Costello, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 11
CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet ~ Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 AO 398 Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons, #2 AO 399 Waiver of Service of Summons)(eta)
|
|
Filing 10
Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:30AM on 10/3/2022 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT on 8/3/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memo from Clerk Re: Corporate Disclosures) ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER AND MEMO RE: CORPORATE DISCLOSURES MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT. (eta)
|
|
Filing 9
Summons Issued as to Jamey Denise Jackson. (eta)
|
|
Filing 8
Summons Issued as to Curtiss Edward Jackson. (eta)
|
|
Filing 7
Summons Issued as to Semisub, Inc. (eta)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 22-00349 SOM-KJM on all further pleadings. (eta)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick R. Costello on behalf of Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf of Securities and Exchange Commission. (Costello, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons (Proposed) (Costello, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons (Proposed) (Costello, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons (Proposed) (Costello, Patrick)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT ; Jury Trial Demanded against All Defendants, filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Costello, Patrick) Modified on 8/3/2022 (eta).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
