Shi v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
| Chuanjun Shi |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Los Angeles Asylum Office of USCIS, David Matthew Radel, Honolulu Field Office of USCIS and Jonathan W. West |
| 1:2022cv00468 |
| November 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| ROM TRADER |
| DERRICK K WATSON |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Chuanjun Shi. All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Gao, Wen Sheng) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (jni) |
| Filing 5 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet - Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Attachments: #1 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #2 Waiver of the Service of Summons)(jni) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 22-00468 DKW-RT on all further pleadings. (jni) |
| Filing 3 Summons (Proposed) (Gao, Wen Sheng) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet by Chuanjun Shi. (Gao, Wen Sheng) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND ACTION IN MANDAMUS against U.S. Department of Homeland Security ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AHIDC-2760209.), filed by Chuanjun Shi.(Gao, Wen Sheng) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
