Preciado vs. Derr
| Maria Antonia Preciado |
| Warden Estelle Derr |
| 1:2022cv00523 |
| December 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| WES REBER PORTER |
| J MICHAEL SEABRIGHT |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 EO: On December 19, 2022, the court received pro se Petitioner Maria Antonia Preciado's "Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 U.S.C. 2241" [ECF No. #1 ]. The Court received the filing fee on January 10, 2023 [ECF No. #3 ]. The government is ORDERED to file an Answer to the Petition on or before February 23, 2023, pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. Petitioner may file an optional Reply on or before March 23, 2023. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to serve a copy of this Entering Order and the Petition on the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Hawaii. IT IS SO ORDERED. (JUDGE J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT)(rlfh)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF) |
| COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 4 Entering Order has been served to the U.S. Attorneys Office for the District of Hawaii through interoffice delivery on January 12, 2023. A copy of 4 Entering Order shall be served by First Class Mail to Maria Antonia Preciado at the address of record on January 13, 2023. (eta) |
| Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number HI034045 re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (eta) |
Filing 2
HABEAS DEFICIENCY ORDER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 12/19/2022. (eta)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 U.S.C. 2241 - - filed by Maria Antonia Preciado. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Documentation)(eta) |
| COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of the #2 HABEAS DEFICIENCY ORDER has been served by First Class Mail to Maria Antonia Preciado at the address of record on December 19, 2022. A blank Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner, its instructions and a file-stamped copy of the habeas petition were included in the mailing to Petitioner. (eta) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Preciado vs. Derr | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Maria Antonia Preciado | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Estelle Derr | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
