Brody v. Hawaiian Airlines Inc.
| Shanah A. Brody |
| Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. and Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv00046 |
| January 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| HELEN GILLMOR |
| KENNETH J MANSFIELD |
| WES REBER PORTER |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 EO: The Court VACATES the Status Conference set for 3/23/2023 at 9:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Wes Reber Porter. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER)(kk) |
| Filing 15 Scheduling Conference Statement of Plaintiff. (Hsieh, Peter) |
| Filing 14 EO: In light of the Order Reassigning Case #13 , the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 3/23/2023 is VACATED. A Status Conference is set for 3/23/2023 at 9:00 AM before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER via Zoom: Dial in number: 1-833-568-8864; Meeting ID: 161 0084 2470. The public may listen to the proceedings by dialing the Public Dial-in number at 1-650-479-3207 and entering Access code: 1601263445. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER)(kk) |
Filing 13
ORDER OF RECUSAL - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 3/15/2023. MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD recused. Case reassigned to MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER for all further proceedings. Please reflect new Civil case number CV 23-00046 HG-WRP on all further filings. (jni)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER OF RECUSAL - Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD on 3/14/2023. (jni)
|
| Filing 11 EO: Due to a conflict in the Court's schedule, the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference previously set for 02/27/2023 IS CONTINUED TO 03/23/2023 at 9:30 a.m. before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD. Scheduling conference statements are due by 03/16/2023. Until further notice, for all hearings before Magistrate Judge Kenneth J. Mansfield, parties are to participate via telephone through the court's NEW ZOOM Teleconference. Call-in information for this conference is below. Parties must connect to the conference at least five (5) minutes prior to the scheduled start time of the hearing.Dial in number is 1-833-568-8864Access Code: 160 8983 1896 OBSERVERS Call-in: 1-650-479-3207; Code: 160 930 3683(MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD)(kjm2) |
| Filing 10 Scheduling Conference Statement Defendants Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. and Hawaiian Holdings, Inc.'s Scheduling Conference Statement. (Rhee, John) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Dismissal Partial Dismissal Without Prejudice of Count 1 (Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. 2000e, ET. SEQ.); Certificate of Service Shanah A. Brody. (Hsieh, Peter) |
| Filing 9 EP: STATUS CONFERENCEThe Court and the attorneys are present via video conference.Discussion held regarding the above-mentioned case and the related case 1:22-cv-00481-HG-KJM Brennan v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. et al. (Reporter-Gloria Bediamol) (SENIOR JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR)(tl) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. Notice of Related Cases Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., Hawaiian Holdings, Inc.. (Rhee, John) |
| Filing 6 EO: The TIME for the Status Conference set for Wednesday, February 15, 2023 has CHANGED from 1:30 PM to 2:30 PM via Video Conference, before SENIOR JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR.The instructions and information to connect by video that was previously provided to counsel, remains the same. (SENIOR JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR)(rls) |
| Filing 5 EO: A Status Conference is set for Wednesday, February 15, 2023 at 1:30 PM via Video Conference, before SENIOR JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR.The courtroom manager will provide the applicable participants with instructions and information to connect by video prior to the scheduled video conference date. (SENIOR JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR)(rls) |
|
Filing 4
Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:30AM on 2/27/2023 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 1/27/2023. ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT. (eta)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 23-00046 HG-KJM on all further pleadings. (eta) |
| NOTICE TO PARTIES RE: Corporate Disclosure Statements - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Criminal Rule 12.4 both address the filing of Corporate Disclosure Statements. Both rules state A party must:(1) file the Rule 7.1(a) or 12.4(a) statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court, and (2) promptly file a supplemental statement upon a change in the information that the statement requires. (eta) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Hawaiian Airlines Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. for Hawaiian Airlines Inc... (Rhee, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Hawaiian Airlines Inc. and Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. from First Circuit Court, case number 1CCV-22-0001420. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AHIDC-2790681), filed by Hawaiian Airlines Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of John Rhee, #2 Exhibit A - Complaint; Demand for Jury Trial; Summons - 1CCV-22-001420, #3 Exhibit B - Return and Acknowledgment, #4 Exhibit C - Proposed Order Setting Scheduling Conference, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rhee, John) Modified on 1/27/2023 (eta). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
