Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Lindsey
Progressive Direct Insurance Company |
Vernon Lindsey |
1:2023cv00236 |
May 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
HELEN GILLMOR |
ROM TRADER |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE by Progressive Direct Insurance Company (WITHDRAWAL AND APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY) Progressive Direct Insurance Company. (Miller, Richard) |
Filing 9 Scheduling Conference Statement . (Shibuya, Ashley) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Progressive Direct Insurance Company. Vernon Lindsey served on 7/6/2023 6/28/2023. (Miller, Richard) Modified on 7/10/2023 (jni) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Progressive Direct Insurance Company. (Smith, Katie) |
Filing 6 Notice to Parties RE: Corporate Disclosure Statements Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Criminal Rule 12.4 both address the filing of Corporate Disclosure Statements. Both rules state A party must:(1) file the Rule 7.1(a) (or 12.4(a)) statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court, and (2) promptly file a supplemental statement upon a change in the information that the statement requires. (jni) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Vernon Lindsey. (jni) |
Filing 4 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet - Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Attachments: #1 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #2 Waiver of the Service of Summons)(jni) |
Filing 3 Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:00AM on 7/31/2023 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 5/31/2023. ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT.(jni) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 23-00236 HG-RT on all further pleadings. (jni) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF against VERNON LINDSEY ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AHIDC-2848365.), filed by Progressive Direct Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons in a Civil Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smith, Katie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Lindsey | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Progressive Direct Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Richard B. Miller |
Represented By: | Katie Lauren Smith |
Represented By: | Ashley R. Shibuya |
Represented By: | Andre Anthony Alers |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Vernon Lindsey | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.