Sills v. Kim et al
Thomas P. Sills, Jr. |
Robert Kim, Kate Perazich, Frederick M. Macapinlac and District Court of the Third Circuit |
1:2023cv00246 |
June 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
LESLIE E KOBAYASHI |
KENNETH J MANSFIELD |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 EO: In light of the #6 Order allowing Plaintiff leave to file his amended complaint by September 14, 2023, the Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference previously set for 09/07/2023 IS CONTINUED TO 10/13/2023 at 9:00 a.m. before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD. Scheduling conference statements are due by 10/04/2023.Parties are to participate via telephone through our ZOOM Teleconference. Call-in information for this conference is below. Parties must connect to the conference at least five (5) minutes prior to the scheduled start time of the hearing.Dial in number is 1-833-568-8864Access Code: 160 8983 1896 (MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD)(bbb)COURTS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF). A courtesy email of this Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) was also sent to Pro Se Plaintiff Thomas P. Sills, Jr. at the email address on record of trytrytry33@yahoo.com on 08/04/2023. |
Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS AND RESERVING RULING ON PLAINTIFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS re #1 , #3 - Signed by JUDGE LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI on 7/31/2023. On the basis of the foregoing, Sills's Complaint for Violation of Civil Rights, filed June 8, 2023, is HEREBY DISMISSED. The dismissal is WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of an amended complaint that cures the defects identified in this Order. Sills is GRANTED leave to file his amended complaint by September 14, 2023. The amended complaint must comply with the terms of this Order. In addition, the Court HEREBY RESERVES RULING on Sills's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, filed June 8, 2023. If Sills chooses to file an amended complaint, and at least a portion of it survives the screening process, the merits of the Application will be addressed. (eta)COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Thomas P. Sills, Jr. has been served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on July 31, 2023. |
Filing 5 Exhibit B to #1 Complaint - filed by Thomas P. Sills, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Documentation)(eta) |
Filing 4 Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:30AM on 8/7/2023 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 6/8/2023. (eta) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs - by Plaintiff Thomas P. Sills, Jr (eta) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet - by Thomas P. Sills, Jr. (eta) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights; Jury Trial Requested against All Defendants - filed by Thomas P. Sills, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(eta) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.