David Sansone Company, Inc., et al v. Bolton, et al
David Sansone Company, Inc., David Sansone, Sansone Company Inc., Los Padres Construction, Inc., Avila Properties, LLC and Sansone Real Estate Investments, LLC |
Daniel B. Bolton and Janet T. Bolton |
1:2023cv00305 |
July 25, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii |
HELEN GILLMOR |
JILL A OTAKE |
WES REBER PORTER |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Daniel B. Bolton, Janet T. Bolton. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Fujioka-Lilley, Terri) |
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Avila Properties, LLC, David Sansone Company, Inc., Los Padres Construction, Inc., David Sansone, Sansone Company Inc., Sansone Real Estate Investments, LLC re 12 Terminate Hearings,, Set Hearings, (Akagi, Trisha) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Sansone, Sansone Company Inc., Sansone Real Estate Investments, LLC, Avila Properties, LLC, David Sansone Company, Inc., Los Padres Construction, Inc.. Janet T. Bolton served on 7/29/2023. (Akagi, Trisha) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Sansone, Sansone Company Inc., Sansone Real Estate Investments, LLC, Avila Properties, LLC, David Sansone Company, Inc., Los Padres Construction, Inc.. Daniel B. Bolton served on 7/29/2023. (Akagi, Trisha) |
Filing 12 EO: In order to allow time for service, the Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED from 9/19/2023 to 12/4/2023 at 8:30 AM before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER via Zoom: Dial in number: 1-833-568-8864; Meeting ID: 161 0084 2470. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER) (jo) |
![]() |
Filing 10 EO: The parties are directed to review the General Civil Case Procedures Before Judge Otake posted on the court's website and are expected to comply with the most recent version that is posted. (JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE)(shm) |
Filing 9 Notice to Parties Re: Corporate Disclosure Statements: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Criminal Rule 12.4 both address the filing of Corporate Disclosure Statements. Both rules state A party must:(1) file the Rule 7.1(a) (or 12.4(a)) statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court, and (2) promptly file a supplemental statement upon a change in the information that the statement requires. (eta) |
Filing 8 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet ~ Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 AO 398 Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons, #2 AO 399 Waiver of Service of Summons)(eta) |
![]() |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (eta) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 23-00305 JAO-WRP on all further pleadings. (eta) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Avila Properties, LLC, David Sansone Company, Inc., Los Padres Construction, Inc., David Sansone, Sansone Company Inc., Sansone Real Estate Investments, LLC. (Akagi, Trisha) |
Filing 3 Summons (Proposed) (Akagi, Trisha) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet by David Sansone Company, Inc., a California corporation. (Akagi, Trisha) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AHIDC-2870596.), filed by David Sansone Company, Inc., a California corporation.(Akagi, Trisha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.