Ortega v. Kijakazi
| Joshua Ortega |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 1:2023cv00376 |
| September 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| KENNETH J MANSFIELD |
| JILL A OTAKE |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Administrative Record. RCD=3/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 Certification Page, #2 Court Transcript Index, #3 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #4 Payment Documents and Decisions, #5 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #6 Non Disability Related Development, #7 Disability Related Development, #8 Medical Records Part 1, #9 Medical Records Part 2)(Barbata, Dana) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Dana A. Barbata on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi. (Barbata, Dana) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin L. Martin on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi. (Martin, Justin) |
| Filing 5 EO: The Court DIRECTS the Respondent, when filing the Administrative Record, to indicate on the docket which attachments include which record page numbers. The Court wants to be able to know which attachment to click on in order to find a particular record page. (JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE)(shm) |
| Filing 4 EO: The parties are directed to review the General Civil Case Procedures Before Judge Otake posted on the court's website and are expected to comply with the most recent version that is posted. (JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE)(shm) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Social Security Case Service: Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405 (g), the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Case Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing System (CM/ECF) notifying the appropriate Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and the United States Attorneys Office of the filing of this case. (jni) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 23-00376 JAO-KJM on all further pleadings. (jni) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Review of Social Security Disability Insurance Determination; Summons Joshua Ortega against Kilolo Kijakazi ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AHIDC-2891917.), filed by Joshua Ortega. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Haar, Diane) Modified on 9/11/2023 (jni) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ortega v. Kijakazi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joshua Ortega | |
| Represented By: | Diane C. Haar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
| Represented By: | Noticing Social Security General Counsel of SSA |
| Represented By: | Justin L. Martin |
| Represented By: | Dana A. Barbata |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
