Chen v. Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff: Meili Chen
Defendant: Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Los Angeles Asylum Office of USCIS, David Matthew Radel, Honolulu Field Office of USCIS and Jayci Roney
Case Number: 1:2023cv00414
Filed: October 9, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Hawaii
Presiding Judge: KENNETH J MANSFIELD
Referring Judge: JILL A OTAKE
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2023 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Sydney Spector on behalf of Department of Homeland Security, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Los Angeles Asylum Office of USCIS, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Matthew Radel, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services on behalf of Department of Homeland Security, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Los Angeles Asylum Office of USCIS, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Matthew Radel, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Spector, Sydney)
October 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PROCEEDINGS; ORDER - Signed by JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE on 10/31/2023. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to administratively close this case during the pendency of the stay. The administrative closure will not impact, in any manner, any party's rights or obligations, and no filing fee is required to reopen the case.(jni)
October 31, 2023 Filing 10 (Proposed) STIPULATION to Stay Case Proceedings by Department of Homeland Security, Honolulu Field Office of USCIS, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Los Angeles Asylum Office of USCIS, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Matthew Radel, Jayci Roney, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Spector, Sydney) Modified on 10/31/2023 (jni)
October 18, 2023 Filing 9 EO: On, October 16, 2023, Government's counsel, Sydney Spector requests for a 30 day extension, with agreement of opposing counsel, as the deadline to respond to the Complaint is currently set for December 11, 2023. Therefore the Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference previously set for 12/11/2023 IS CONTINUED TO 01/12/2024 at 9:30 a.m. before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD. Scheduling conference statements are due by 01/05/2023.Parties are to participate via telephone through our ZOOM Teleconference. Call-in information for this conference is below. Parties must connect to the conference at least five (5) minutes prior to the scheduled start time of the hearing.Dial in number is 1-833-568-8864Access Code: 160 8983 1896 (MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD)(bbb)
October 12, 2023 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Meili Chen. All Defendants. (Gao, Wen Sheng)
October 11, 2023 Filing 7 EO: The parties are directed to review the General Civil Case Procedures Before Judge Otake posted on the court's website and are expected to comply with the most recent version that is posted. (JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE)(shm)
October 10, 2023 Filing 6 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet ~ Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 AO 398 Notice of Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of Summons, #2 AO 399 Waiver of Service of Summons)(eta)
October 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:30AM on 12/11/2023 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 10/10/2023. ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT. (eta)
October 10, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (eta)
October 10, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 23-00414 JAO-KJM on all further pleadings. (eta)
October 9, 2023 Filing 2 Summons (Proposed) (Gao, Wen Sheng)
October 9, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND ACTION IN MANDAMUS against Department of Homeland Security ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AHIDC-2904394.), filed by Meili Chen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gao, Wen Sheng)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chen v. Department of Homeland Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Meili Chen
Represented By: Wen Sheng Gao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Homeland Security
Represented By: Sydney Spector
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: Sydney Spector
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Represented By: Sydney Spector
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Represented By: Sydney Spector
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ted H. Kim
Represented By: Sydney Spector
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Los Angeles Asylum Office of USCIS
Represented By: Sydney Spector
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Matthew Radel
Represented By: Sydney Spector
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Honolulu Field Office of USCIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jayci Roney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?