Lyons et al v. V2 Logistics Corp. et al
| John Luke Lyons, Louise L. Tuttle and Craig W. Walsh |
| V2 Logistics Corp., AM2 Freight Operations, Inc. and Great Silk Road Transportation Inc. |
| 1:2023cv00439 |
| October 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| JILL A OTAKE |
| WES REBER PORTER |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 EO: In order to allow time for service, the Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED from 12/27/2023 to 2/27/2024 at 8:30 a.m. before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER via Zoom: Dial in number: 1-833-568-8864; Meeting ID: 161 0084 2470. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER) (jo)COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants will be served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on 11/27/2023. Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and NEFs by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF). |
Filing 15
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' APPLICATIONS TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS re #13 , #14 - Signed by JUDGE JILL A. OTAKE on 11/22/2023. For all these reasons, the IFP Applications are DENIED. Plaintiffs are therefore reminded of their obligation to timely serve all defendants in compliance with the Federal Rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h), (m). COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Non-Registered CM/ECF Participants shall be served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the (NEF) on 11/24/2023. Pro Se (Non-Prisoner) Litigants that have consented to receive documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by email, have been served electronically at the e-mail address listed on the (NEF).(jni)
|
| Filing 14 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs - by Plaintiff Craig W. Walsh. (jni) |
| Filing 13 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs - by Plaintiff Louise L. Tuttle. (jni) |
| Filing 12 EO: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff Craig W. Walsh's APPLICATION for Permission to Participate in Electronic Filing, ECF No. #11 . Plaintiff must comply with all rules regarding electronic filling and familiarize himself with electronic filing resources, user guide, and training modules available on the Court's website. Plaintiff shall contact the Clerk's Office to obtain the necessary information to allow him to file electronically. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER) (jo)COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - John Luke Lyons and Louise L. Tuttle will be served by First Class Mail on November 3, 2023 to the addresses of record list on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF). Registered Participants of CM/ECF received the document electronically to the email addresses listed on the NEF. |
| Filing 11 APPLICATION for Permission to Participate in Electronic Filing - by Craig W. Walsh (eta) |
| Filing 10 Pro Se Consent to Receive Documents and Notices of Electronic Filings by Email - by Plaintiff Craig W. Walsh (eta) |
| COURT'S CERTIFICATE of Service - a copy of #6 Summons Issued, #7 Summons Issued, #8 Summons Issued were served on plaintiffs at the Clerk's Office service counter on 10/30/2023. A copy of 9 Notice to Parties RE: Corporate Disclosure Statement, shall be served by First Class Mail to plaintiffs at the addresses of record on 11/1/2023. (jni) |
| Filing 9 Notice to Parties RE: Corporate Disclosure Statements Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Criminal Rule 12.4 both address the filing of Corporate Disclosure Statements. Both rules state A party must:(1) file the Rule 7.1(a) (or 12.4(a)) statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court, and (2) promptly file a supplemental statement upon a change in the information that the statement requires. (jni) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to AM2 Freight Operations, Inc. (jni) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Great Silk Road Transportation Inc. (jni) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to V2 Logistics Corp. (jni) |
| Filing 5 POWER OF ATTORNEY - by John Luke Lyons, Louise L. Tuttle, Craig W. Walsh. COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Plaintiffs were served at the Clerk's Office service counter. (jni) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet - Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Attachments: #1 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #2 Waiver of the Service of Summons)(jni) |
|
Filing 3
Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:00AM on 12/27/2023 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 10/30/2023. COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Plaintiffs were served at the Clerk's Office service counter. (jni)
|
| Filing 2 Filing fee received: $ 402, Receipt number 1658 re #1 Complaint. (jni) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for a Civil Case against V2 Logistics Corp., AM2 Freight Operations, Inc., Great Silk Road Transportation Inc. - filed by John Luke Lyons, Louise L. Tuttle, Craig W. Walsh. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Attachment 3, #4 Attachment 4, #5 Attachment 5, #6 Attachment 6, #7 Attachment 7, #8 Attachment 8, #9 Attachment 9, #10 Attachment 10, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(jni) Modified on 10/31/2023 (jni) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
