He v. Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration, et al.
Zhu He |
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Los Angeles Asylum Office of USCIS, David Matthew Radel, Honolulu Field Office of USCIS and Jayci Roney |
1:2023cv00478 |
November 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
HELEN GILLMOR |
WES REBER PORTER |
Other Immigration Actions |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Sydney Spector on behalf of Honolulu Field Office of USCIS, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Los Angeles Asylum Office of USCIS, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Matthew Radel, Jayci Roney, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security on behalf of Honolulu Field Office of USCIS, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Los Angeles Asylum Office of USCIS, Alejandro Mayorkas, David Matthew Radel, Jayci Roney, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (Spector, Sydney) |
Filing 10 EO: In light of the #9 Stipulation to Stay Case Proceedings, the Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 4/8/2024 at 9:30 a.m. is VACATED and will be rescheduled if appropriate. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER) (jo) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PROCEEDINGS; ORDER - Signed by SENIOR JUDGE HELEN GILLMOR on 1/2/2024. (jni) |
Filing 8 EO: Due to a conflict with the Court's schedule, the Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED from 1/22/2024 to 4/8/2024 at 9:30 AM before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER via Zoom: Dial in number: 1-833-568-8864; Meeting ID: 161 0084 2470. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER) (jo) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Zhu He. U.S. Attorney's Office served on 12/5/2023. All Defendants. (Gao, Wen Sheng) Modified on 12/8/2023 (jni) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Ted H. Kim, Los Angeles Asylum Office of USCIS, David Matthew Radel, Honolulu Field Office of USCIS, Jayci Roney. (jni) |
Filing 5 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet - Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Attachments: #1 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #2 Waiver of the Service of Summons)(jni) |
Filing 4 Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:00AM on 1/22/2024 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 11/27/2023. ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT.(jni) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 23-00478 HG-WRP on all further pleadings. (jni) |
Filing 2 Summons (Proposed) (Gao, Wen Sheng) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Action in Mandamus, Exhibit #1 & 2 against U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Alejandro Mayorkas; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services; Ur Mendoza Jaddou; Ted H. Kim; Los Angeles Asylum Office of USCIS; David Matthew Radel; Honolulu Field Office of USCIS; Jayci Roney ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AHIDC-2925265.), filed by Zhu He. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)(Gao, Wen Sheng) Modified on 11/27/2023 (jni) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.