Hecht v. Tinguely Development, Inc.
| Barbara A. Hecht |
| Tinguely Development, Inc. |
| 1:2023cv00631 |
| December 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| HELEN GILLMOR |
| WES REBER PORTER |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Barbara A. Hecht. Tinguely Development, Inc. served on 1/31/2024. (Brower, Charles) |
| Filing 7 EO: In order to allow time for service, the Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is CONTINUED from 2/26/2024 to 5/14/2024 at 9:30 AM before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER via Zoom: Dial in number: 1-833-568-8864; Meeting ID: 161 0084 2470. (MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER) (jo) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Tinguely Development, Inc. (jni) |
| Filing 5 Notice to Parties RE: Corporate Disclosure Statements Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Criminal Rule 12.4 both address the filing of Corporate Disclosure Statements. Both rules state A party must:(1) file the Rule 7.1(a) (or 12.4(a)) statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court, and (2) promptly file a supplemental statement upon a change in the information that the statement requires. (jni) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet - Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Attachments: #1 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #2 Waiver of the Service of Summons)(jni) |
Filing 3
Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:00AM on 2/26/2024 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE WES REBER PORTER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 12/28/2023. ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT.(jni)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 23-00631 HG-WRP on all further pleadings. (jni) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT; Jury Demand; Summons against Tinguely Development, Inc. Barbara A. Hecht ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AHIDC-2938957.), filed by Barbara A. Hecht. (Attachments: #1 Jury Demand, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brower, Charles) Modified on 12/28/2023 (jni) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hecht v. Tinguely Development, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Barbara A. Hecht | |
| Represented By: | Michael P. Healy |
| Represented By: | Charles H. Brower |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tinguely Development, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
