Salcido v. Nguyen
| Andrew Salcido |
| Nguyen Nguyen |
| 1:2024cv00013 |
| January 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
| ROM TRADER |
| DERRICK K WATSON |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT entered on 2/7/2024 pursuant to ECF Nos. #4 , #5 . (eta)COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Andrew Salcido has been served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on February 7, 2024. |
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE re #1 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 2/7/2024. In sum, as four out of five factors favor dismissal, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to remit the filing fee pursuant to the Court's January 11, 2024 Order. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1263 (finding dismissal warranted where three out of five factors weighed in favor of dismissal); Malone v. U.S. Postal Serv., 833 F.2d 128, 133 n.2 (9th Cir. 1987) (finding that where the other four factors favor dismissal, they are not outweighed by public policy favoring the resolution of cases on their merits); see also Ash v. Cvetkov, 739 F.2d 493, 497 (9th Cir. 1984) ("dismissal without prejudice is a more easily justified sanction for failure to prosecute."). The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case. (eta)COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Andrew Salcido has been served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on February 7, 2024.
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES OR COSTS re #2 - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 1/11/2024. Salcido may have until January 31, 2024 to pay the required filing fee. The Court cautions Salcido that failure to pay the fee by that date will result in the automatic dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice. (eta)COURT'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - Andrew Salcido has been served by First Class Mail to the address of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on January 11, 2024.
|
|
Filing 3
Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:00AM on 3/11/2024 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE ROM TRADER - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 1/9/2024. A copy of this order was provided to the Plaintiff at the time of filing. (eta)
|
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs - by Plaintiff Andrew Salcido (eta) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for a Civil Case against Nguyen Nguyen - filed by Andrew Salcido.(eta) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Salcido v. Nguyen | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Andrew Salcido | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Nguyen Nguyen | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
