Sakai v. Schiff
Carey Sakai |
Kim Teresa Schiff, John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and Doe Corporate Entities 1-10 |
1:2024cv00119 |
March 11, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
KENNETH J MANSFIELD |
MICAH WJ SMITH |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet ~ Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Attachments: #1 AO 398 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #2 AO 399 Waiver of the Service of Summons)(eta) |
Filing 6 Order Setting Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 09:30AM on 5/13/2024 before MAGISTRATE JUDGE KENNETH J. MANSFIELD - Signed by CHIEF JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON on 3/12/2024. ATTACH THE SCHEDULING ORDER TO THE INITIATING DOCUMENT (COMPLAINT/NOTICE OF REMOVAL). THE SCHEDULING ORDER MUST BE SERVED WITH THE DOCUMENT. (eta) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Kim Teresa Schiff. (eta) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 24-00119 MWJS-KJM on all further pleadings. (eta) |
Filing 3 Summons (Proposed) (Stewart, Andrew) |
Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury. (Stewart, Andrew) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kim Teresa Schiff ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AHIDC-2972807.), filed by Carey Sakai.(Stewart, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.