Omoso v. Carvalho et al
Epepanio M. Omoso |
Richard Carvalho, GAR Corp. a Hawaii Corporation doing business as Global Auto Repair, Global Auto Repair and Does 1-100 |
1:2024cv00154 |
April 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Hawaii |
MICAH WJ SMITH |
ROM TRADER |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CIVIL Waiver of Service Packet - Notice to Parties Regarding Service Pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Attachments: #1 Notice of a Lawsuit and Request to Waive Service of a Summons, #2 Waiver of the Service of Summons)(jni) |
Filing 4 Notice to Parties RE: Corporate Disclosure Statements Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and Criminal Rule 12.4 both address the filing of Corporate Disclosure Statements. Both rules state A party must:(1) file the Rule 7.1(a) (or 12.4(a)) statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court, and (2) promptly file a supplemental statement upon a change in the information that the statement requires. (jni) |
|
Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment: Please reflect Civil case number CV 24-00154 MWJS-RT on all further pleadings. (jni) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AHIDC-2982736.), filed by Epepanio Omoso.(White, Lockey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Hawaii District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.