Central IL Carpenters Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Struben
| Central IL Carpenters Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Mid Central Illinois District Council of Carpenters, Mid Central Illinois District Council of Carpenters Apprenticeship Fund, Central IL Carpenters Annuity Fund, Carpenters Fringe Benefit Funds, Carpenters Local #63 and Carpenters Local 644 |
| Helen M Struben, S&S Fashion Floors, Inc and Flooring Products, Inc. |
| 1:2005cv01094 |
| March 24, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Logan |
| John A. Gorman |
| Other Contract |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1145 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
OPINION AND ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge John A. Gorman on 4/20/09: THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION to amend 98 is granted, and the Clerk is directed to amend the judgment as to Count III, to include attorney's fees and costs. The amount of fees and costs will be considered in another order. The Defendants' Motion to reconsider 100 is denied in its entirety. (TK, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER: Count I: The Funds have proven their case against S&S. Judgment is therefore entered in favor of Plaintiffs and against S&S on Count I in the amount of $56,386.39 plus attorneys fees. Counsel is directed to submit an affidavit of fees wit h supporting documentation within 14 days. Defendant may respond to the attorney fee calculation and documentation within 14 days thereafter. Count II: The Funds have failed to prove that Helen Struben breached her fiduciary duty. Judgment is therefo re entered in favor of Helen Struben and against Plaintiffs on Count II. Count III: I find that Helen Struben was an alter ego for S&S. Judgement is therefore enteredin favor of Plaintiffs and against Helen Struben on Count III in the amount of $ ;56,386.39. Count IV: I find that FPI and S&S were not a single employer. Judgment is therefore entered in favor of the FPI and against the Plaintiffs.Count V: I find that FPI was not an alter ego of S&S. Judgment is therefore entered in favor of FPI and against the Plaintiffs. Entered by Magistrate Judge John Gorman. Case terminated.. Entered by Magistrate Judge John A. Gorman on 2/24/9. (HK, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
