Moore v. Liszewski et al
Sammy J Moore |
Peter Liszewski, Mark G Couleas, John Doe and . Mahone |
1:2007cv01173 |
June 29, 2007 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Peoria Office |
Livingston |
Harold A. Baker |
John A. Gorman |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 127 ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 3/31/10 directing the agency having custody of the plaintiff to remit the appellate fees of $455 to the District Court for appeal no. 09-3515. (cc: plaintiff/Correctional Center Trust Fund Office/Fin Adm)(MSB, ilcd) |
Filing 113 ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 9/28/09 granting 88 Motion for Summary Judgment: 1.The defendants' motion for summary judgment 88 is granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 56(c). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgme nt in this case in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 56(c). This lawsuit is terminated in its entirety. 2.If the plaintiff wishes to appeal this decision, he must file a notice of appeal with this cou rt within 30 days of entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). A motion forleave to appeal in forma pauperis should set forth the issues the plaintiff plans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(c). If the plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $455.00 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. Furthermore, if the appeal is found to be non-meritorious,the plaintiff may also accumulate another strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (cc: plaintiff) (MSB, ilcd) |
Filing 112 ORDER granting 78 Motion for Summary Judgment entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 9/17/09: 1.IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendants' motion for summary judgment 78 is granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 56(c). The clerk of the cou rt is directed to enter judgment at the close of this case against the plaintiff pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 56(c). 2.If the plaintiff wishes to appeal this decision, he must file a notice of appeal with this court within 30 days of entry of ju dgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). A motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis should set forth the issues the plaintiff plans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(c). If the Plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $455.00 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. Furthermore, if the appeal is found to be non-meritorious, the plaintiff may also accumulate another strike under 28U.S.C. 1915(g). (cc: plaintiff)(MSB, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.