Hearn v. Kennell et al
| Michael G Hearn |
| Eldon Kennell, Richard Runyon, Robert R Griffin, Eddie Jones and Roger E Walker |
| 1:2007cv01235 |
| September 13, 2007 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Livingston |
| Harold A. Baker |
| John A. Gorman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER on Motion for Summary Judgment entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 10/22/09: Ordered that the defendants' motion for summary judgment 31 is granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 56(c). The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgm ent against the plaintiff pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). If the plaintiff wishes to appeal this decision, he must file a notice of appeal with this court within 30 days of entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). A motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis should set forth the issues the plaintiff plans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(c). If the plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $455.00 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. Furthermore, if the appeal is found to be non-meritorious, the plaintiff may also accumulate a strike under 28U.S.C. 1915(g). (cc: plaintiff)(MSB, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
