Roop v. Lincoln College
Plaintiff: Nancy Roop
Defendant: Lincoln College
Case Number: 1:2009cv01051
Filed: February 9, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: McLean
Presiding Judge: Byron G. Cudmore
Presiding Judge: Joe Billy McDade
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:621 Job Discrimination (Age)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER & OPINION granting 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment against the Plf and in favor of Defendant. Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 3/14/2011. (RK, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roop v. Lincoln College
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy Roop
Represented By: Carrie Lee Borowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lincoln College
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?