Cummins, Inc. v. TAS Distributing Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Cummins, Inc.
Defendant: TAS Distributing Company, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2009cv01096
Filed: March 18, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Patent Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: John A. Gorman
Presiding Judge: Joe Billy McDade
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 11/30/09. 18 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. 23 Motion for Leave to File a surreply is DENIED. 26 Motion to Stay Discovery is DENIED AS MOOT. CASE TERMINATED. (SM, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cummins, Inc. v. TAS Distributing Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cummins, Inc.
Represented By: Jonathan R Spivey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TAS Distributing Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?