Walker v. Mahone

Walker v. Mahone

Plaintiff:	Levant Walker
Defendant:	Sylvia Mahone
Case Number:	1:2009cv01128
Filed:	April 9, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office:	Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County:	Livingston
Presiding Judge:	Harold A. Baker
Presiding Judge:	John A. Gorman
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	Federal Question
Jury Demanded By:	42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 8, 2010	Filing 68 ORDER entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 12/8/10: 1) Defendant Mahone's first motion for summary judgement is denied.[d/e 39] 2) Defendant Mahone is to provide the Plaintiff with a copy of the medical records she has obtained concerning the Pl aintiff's claims within the next 21 days. The Plaintiff's various motions for copies of his medical records are denied. [d/e 48, 49,51, 60, 67] The court will allow the Plaintiff additional time to provide further response to the pending m otion for summary judgement. The Plaintiff must file any additional response on or before January 5, 2011. 3) The Plaintiff's motion for a trial date is denied [d/e 61]. The Defendant's motion to strike the motion is therefore moot. [d/e 65] 4) The motion to strike the Plaintiff's statements of undisputed facts is denied. [d/e 62]. However, the Plaintiff is admonished that he must provide a more complete response to the summary judgement motion providing some evidence to support his claims. (cc: plaintiff)(MSB, ilcd)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 8, 2010

Filing 68 ORDER entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 12/8/10: 1) Defendant Mahone's first motion for summary judgement is denied.[d/e 39] 2) Defendant Mahone is to provide the Plaintiff with a copy of the medical records she has obtained concerning the Pl aintiff's claims within the next 21 days. The Plaintiff's various motions for copies of his medical records are denied. [d/e 48, 49,51, 60, 67] The court will allow the Plaintiff additional time to provide further response to the pending m otion for summary judgement. The Plaintiff must file any additional response on or before January 5, 2011. 3) The Plaintiff's motion for a trial date is denied [d/e 61]. The Defendant's motion to strike the motion is therefore moot. [d/e 65] 4) The motion to strike the Plaintiff's statements of undisputed facts is denied. [d/e 62]. However, the Plaintiff is admonished that he must provide a more complete response to the summary judgement motion providing some evidence to support his claims. (cc: plaintiff)(MSB, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Mahone
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Levant Walker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Sylvia Mahone
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?