United States of America v. Stokke et al
United States of America |
Mark A Stokke, Bonnie K Stokke and Janet Stokke |
1:2010cv01352 |
November 5, 2010 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Peoria Office |
Hancock |
Joe Billy McDade |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER & OPINION Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 9/20/2011. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT this matter will remained stayed forsix months, and the Court will hold a status hearing on April 23, 2012 at 11:00 A.M. in Courtroom D in Peoria, Illinios, before Judge Joe Billy McDade at which the parties must show cause why this matter should not be dismissed. (cc:Dfts) (RP, ilcd) |
Filing 20 ORDER & OPINION Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 3/23/2011. Before the Court is Plaintiff United States' Motion to Stay these Proceedings Pending Defendant's Bankruptcy. 19 . Pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(D)(2), the parties are given 180 days to SHOW CAUSE as to why this case should not be dismissed if relief from the stay is not otherwise sought. IT IS SO ORDERED. (RP, ilcd) Modified on 3/23/2011 to correct text (RP, ilcd). |
Filing 10 ORDER & OPINION Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 11/22/2010. Plaintiff's 9 Motion to Dismiss Defendant Janet Stokke is GRANTED, and Defendant Janet Stokke is DISMISSED from this action. IT IS SO ORDERED.(RP, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.