Luster v. Meredith et al
| Alan Luster |
| John Doe 2, Lisa Madigan, Martin Meredith and John Doe, 1 |
| 1:2011cv01018 |
| January 19, 2011 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Livingston |
| James E. Shadid |
| John A. Gorman |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
Merit Review Order entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 5/5/11. Plaintiff's 6 First Motion to Amend Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff's amended complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915A. All p ending motions 7 are DENIED AS MOOT. The court will allow the Plaintiff one opportunity to file a second amended complaint clarifying his claim of denial of meaningful access to the courts. The Plaintiff must specify how the allegedly inadequate l aw library impacted a specific claim or lawsuit and state how each Defendant was involved in those claims. The Plaintiff must file his second amended complaint within 21 days of this order. Failure to follow the court's instructions or to meet this deadline will resultin the dismissal of this lawsuit. This cause is set for merit review hearing on the Plaintiff's second amended complaint on June 16, 2011 at 10:00 by telephone conference call(court will place call) before Judge James E. Shadid). cc: Plaintiff(FDT, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
