Hammond v. System Transport, Inc. et al
| Curtis J Hammond, Jr |
| Trans-System, Inc., Robert D Austin and System Transport, Inc. |
| 1:2011cv01295 |
| August 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Fulton |
| John A. Gorman |
| Joe Billy McDade |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER & OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 9/12/13. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's First Motion in Limine 72 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, Plaintiff's Second Motion in Limine 73 is GRANTED, Plaintiff's Third Motion in Limine 74 is DENIED, and Defendants' Fourth Motion in Limine 81 is DENIED. SEE FULL ORDER. (FDT, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER & OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 6/20/13. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Counts IX and X of Plaintiff's Complaint 49 is GRANTED. Counts IX and X are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This matter is SET for a telephone status conference on July 22, 2013, at 1:30 pm, at which the Court will set the dates for final pretrial conference and trial. The Court will place the call to the lead attorneys of record. SEE WRITTEN ORDER. (AEM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER & OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 4/26/13: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion in Limine 52 is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART and Defendants' Motion for Protective Order 53 is DENIED IN PART and GRANTE D IN PART. Defendant Austin SHALL appear for a deposition within twenty-eight days of the date of this Order. Evidence of Defendant Austin's observations or actions prior to the vehicle collision WILL NOT be admitted at trial, and Plaintiff SHAL L refrain from asking questions about them during the deposition. Plaintiffs amended response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DUE twenty-one days after the deposition of Defendant Austin. Defendants' reply to this response is DUE fourteen days after Plaintiff's response is filed. The currently scheduled dates the final pretrial conference and trial are VACATED, to be reset after the pending Motion for Summary Judgment is resolved. SEE WRITTEN ORDER. (AEM, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER AND OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 8/6/2012. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' Motion to Exclude Exhibits Offered in Support of Motion to Dismiss 17 is GRANTED, and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts II, IV, VI, and VIII of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint is GRANTED 13 . This matter is referred back to Magistrate Judge John A. Gorman for further pretrial proceedings. IT IS SO ORDERED. (KB, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
