McClary v. Unknown Others et al
| Mark A McClary |
| Unknown Others, John Doe, Robert . Huston, . Renee and . Jessica |
| 1:2011cv01394 |
| October 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Livingston |
| John A. Gorman |
| Joe Billy McDade |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 08/15/2013. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:Defendants Alexander's, Bonnette's, and Shah's Motion for Summary Judgmentis GRANTED 49 . The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor o f all remaining Defendants and against Plaintiff. This case is terminated, with the parties to bear their own costs. If Plaintiff wishes to appeal this judgment, he must file a notice of appeal with this Court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). If Plaintiff wishes to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, his motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis must identify the issues Plaintiff will present on appealto assist the Court in determining whether the appeal is t aken in good faith. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(c); see also Celske v. Edwards, 164 F.3d 396, 398 (7th Cir. 1999) (an appellant should be given an opportunity to submit a statement of his grounds for appealing so that the district judge "can ma ke a responsible assessment of the issue of good faith."); Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626, 632 (7th Cir. 2000) (providing that a good faith appeal is an appeal that "a reasonable person could suppose... has some merit" from a leg al perspective). If Plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $455.00 appellate filing fee regardless of the outcome of the appeal. See Full Written Opinion. (JS, ilcd) Modified on 8/16/2013 to reflect document was an Opinion. (JS, ilcd).
|
|
Filing
59
OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 08/12/2013. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: Defendants Huston's, Hostetler's, and Moretto's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED 51 . See Full Written Opinion.(JS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
58
OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 08/07/2013. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: Defendants Huston's, Hostetler's, and Moretto's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED 46 . See Full Written Order.(JS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
