Jones v. Quinn et al
| Gerald Jones |
| Tranchent, Holly, . Jones, Randy Pfister, Jason Brockett, Zachary Buchenau, Douglas Brown, Tracy Nodine, Angelica Joyner, Patrick Hobart, Patrick Quinn, Helen Hamilton, . Moore and Salvador Godinez |
| 1:2011cv01445 |
| December 5, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Livingston |
| James E. Shadid |
| John A. Gorman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 9/24/2013. IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART 38 . Defendants Nodine, Hobart, Holly, and Griffith are DISMISSED as defendants . Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Tracy Nodine is GRANTED 27 . Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration and to Vacate Judgment Dismissing any Defendant 22 and Motion to Vacate Judgment of this Merit Review Order of 9/18/12 28 are MOOT. Def endants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART, AND MOOT IN PART 31 . This case is set for Status Conference on 10/4/2013 at 10:30 AM OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS THE COURT REACHES THE CASE by telephone from Peoria (court will place call) before Chief Judge James E. Shadid. See full Order attached. (cc: Pro Se Plf) (RK, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
