Occupational Safety and Health Administration v. All-Feed Processing and Packaging Inc

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Central District Occupational Safety and Health Administration v. All-Feed Processing and Packaging Inc

Occupational Safety and Health Administration v. All-Feed Processing and Packaging Inc

Plaintiff:	Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Defendant:	All-Feed Processing and Packaging Inc
Case Number:	1:2011mc01054
Filed:	May 3, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office:	Peoria Office
County:	Adams
Presiding Judge:	John A. Gorman
Presiding Judge:	Joe Billy McDade
Nature of Suit:	Other

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 11, 2012	Filing 31 ORDER & OPINION Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 11/11/12. Defendant's Rule 59(e) Motion to Amend the Court's Ruling on Plaintiff's Petition for Civil Contempt Order 28 is DENIED. (SW, ilcd)
March 24, 2012	Filing 27 ORDER & OPINION Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 3/24/12. The Court finds that Defendant was in contempt of the Court's May 3, 2011 Warrant beginning May 4, 2011, and imposes a coercive $500/day fine until Defendant complies with the Wa rrant; Defendant also must pay Plaintiff's attorneys fees and costs associated with its Petition for Contempt. The Court also finds that Defendant purged the contempt on July 5, 2011. Defendant is thus liable for $31,000 in coercive fines for the contempt, and $10,964.95 in Plaintiff's fees and costs associated with the Petition for Contempt. IT IS SO ORDERED. (SW, ilcd)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 11, 2012

Filing 31 ORDER & OPINION Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 11/11/12. Defendant's Rule 59(e) Motion to Amend the Court's Ruling on Plaintiff's Petition for Civil Contempt Order 28 is DENIED. (SW, ilcd)

March 24, 2012

Filing 27 ORDER & OPINION Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 3/24/12. The Court finds that Defendant was in contempt of the Court's May 3, 2011 Warrant beginning May 4, 2011, and imposes a coercive $500/day fine until Defendant complies with the Wa rrant; Defendant also must pay Plaintiff's attorneys fees and costs associated with its Petition for Contempt. The Court also finds that Defendant purged the contempt on July 5, 2011. Defendant is thus liable for $31,000 in coercive fines for the contempt, and $10,964.95 in Plaintiff's fees and costs associated with the Petition for Contempt. IT IS SO ORDERED. (SW, ilcd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Occupational Safety and Health Administration v. All-Feed Processing and Packaging Inc
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Represented By:	Denise C Hockley-Cann
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: All-Feed Processing and Packaging Inc
Represented By:	Paul Burmeister
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?