Solis v. Maximus Multimedia International, LLC et al
Hilda L. Solis |
Maximus Multimedia International, LLC and Maximus Multimedia International, LLC 401(k) Savings Plan |
1:2012cv01208 |
June 27, 2012 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Peoria Office |
Peoria |
John A. Gorman |
Joe Billy McDade |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER & OPINION Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 2/1/13 granting 6 Motion for Default Judgment: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1) Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment 6 is GRANTED. Default Judgment is ENTERED against Defendants Maximus and the Plan. (See Written Order).. (TK, ilcd) |
Filing 7 ORDER & OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 1/14/13. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment 6 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. Plaintiff SHALL file a supplemental brief within 21 days (2/4/13) of the date of this Order, explaining her choice of Spencer, Fane, Britt & Browne, LLP for independent fiduciary, why a fee of up to $59,423.00 is reasonable, and what a reasonable cost for bonding would be in this case. If the Court is satisfied with Plaintiff's explanations, it will enter default judgment and the equitable relief sought, or will modify the award of equitable relief as necessary. SEE FULL ORDER. (FDT, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.