Natural Resources Defense Council et al v. Ameren Energy Resources Company LLC et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 23, 2016
ORDER & OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 8/23/2016. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 104 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court concludes thatPlaintiffs have standing to bring this lawsu it, grants summary judgment to Plaintiffs on all opacity exceedances in Counts One and Two for which they have moved for summary judgment, and grants summary judgment to Plaintiffs on all exceedances for which they have moved for summary judgment wit h respect to Count Three except for those opacity exceedances that occurred while the relevant unit was off-line. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 108 is GRANTED with respect to those particulate matter exceedances in Count Three that occurre d while the relevant unit was off-line, but otherwise DENIED. Plaintiffs Motion to Strike 119 is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiffs motion to exclude certain expert testimony 113 remains pending. By September 1, 2016, Plaintiffs shall notify the Court whether this order has mooted any of the issues raised in that motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. (RK, ilcd)
|October 13, 2015
ORDER & OPINION granting 94 Motion entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 10/13/2015. (SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER) (VP, ilcd)
|August 17, 2015
ORDER & OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 8/17/2015. The Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Movants Appeal of the Magistrate Judges Order Compelling Disclosure of Certain Communications. 80 . The order entered by Magistrate Judge To m Schanzle-Haskins on June 17, 2015 79 is MODIFIED AS FOLLOWS: Document Request No. 1 in the Notice is modified to require that McFadden produce unprivileged documents that contain: (1) any statement made by the Named Standing Witness concerning E dwards; and (2) any communication from McFadden to a Named Standing Witness to which the Named Standing Witnessresponded with a statement concerning Edwards. McFadden need not produce thethird category of documents: any response by McFadden to any statement made bythe Named Standing Witnesses concerning Edwards.(RK, ilcd)
|October 28, 2013
ORDER & OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 10/28/2013. Magistrate Judge Cudmore's Report & Recommendation 28 is ADOPTED IN PART, and MODIFIED IN PART, AND Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 17 is DENIED. This matter is REFERRED BACK to Magistrate Judge Cudmore for further pretrial proceedings. (RK, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?