Singleton v. Tangman et al
| Corrie Singleton |
| Gregory Tangman, Dale Scrogum, James Blackard, R Allen, E Lewis, . Maier, . Shelton, . Smith, J Birkell, . Eschimo, . Garlik, . Martens and Andrew Tilden |
| 1:2013cv01301 |
| July 8, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Livingston |
| John A. Gorman |
| Michael M. Mihm |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER ON PAVEY HEARING and AMENDED ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 9/19/14. The DENIAL of Defendant ANDREW TILDEN, M.D's Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of Exhaustion 44 is affirmed; The DENIAL of Defendants' RICHARD ALLEN, JOHN BIRKEL, JAMES BLACKARD, JOHN GARLICK, EDWARD LEWIS, BRIAN MAIER, DALE SCROGUM, WILLIAM SHELTON, DEREK SMITH and GREGORY TANGMAN Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of Exhaustion 45 is AFFIRMED except as to Defendant ESHELMAN; The Court hereby AMENDS its Order on Motions for Summary Judgment 45 as to Defendant ESCHELMAN finding that plaintiff failed to exhaust his remedies as to this Defendant. Summary Judgment on the issue of Exhaustion is GRANTED as to ESCHELMAN and the Clerk is directed to terminate her as a party in this case.(SW, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
