Alice J. Guth et al v. Enbridge Pipelines (FSP) LLC

Plaintiff: Alice J. Guth and Kinsella Farms, Inc.
Defendant: Enbridge Pipelines (FSP) LLC
Case Number: 1:2013cv01310
Filed: July 12, 2013
Court: Illinois Central District Court
Office: Peoria Office
County: McLean
Referring Judge: Byron G. Cudmore
Presiding Judge: James E. Shadid
Nature of Suit: Condemnation
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alice J. Guth et al v. Enbridge Pipelines (FSP) LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alice J. Guth
Represented By: Mercer Dean Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kinsella Farms, Inc.
Represented By: Mercer Dean Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Enbridge Pipelines (FSP) LLC
Represented By: Christopher J Spanos
Represented By: John A Heller
Represented By: Gerald A Ambrose
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.