Douglas v. Hobart et al
| Jamale Douglas |
| . Lourent, . Jesse, . Zimmerman, . Trainor, . Moore, . Rosenberg, Alton Angus, . Blackard, . Hobart, . Tangman, . Eilts, Krisi Eschelman, L Smith and . Newman |
| 1:2013cv01517 |
| October 31, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Livingston |
| Byron G. Cudmore |
| James E. Shadid |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
MERIT REVIEW OPINION AND ORDER Entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 12/19/2013. IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff Jamale Douglas' motion for appointment of counsel 4 is DENIED. The Court finds that Plaintiff's Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need and civil conspiracy. Accordingly, those claims and Defendants Angus, Tangman, Eilts, Eschelman, Smith, and Newhall (identified on the Courts docket as Newman) ar e hereby dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO: ATTEMPT SERVICE ON DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO THE STANDARD PROCEDURES; AND SET AN INTERNAL COURT DEADLINE 60 DAYS FROM THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER FOR THE COURT TO CHECK ON THE STATUS OF SERVICE AND ENTER SCHEDULING DEADLINES. (SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER)(JRK, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
