Donelson v. Pfister
| Charles Donelson |
| Richard Harrington and Attorney General of the State of Illinois |
| 1:2013cv01523 |
| October 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Peoria Office |
| Livingston |
| Joe Billy McDade |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
ORDER & OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 2/13/2017. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Doc. 83 ) is GRANTED. The Court's Order dated December 20, 2016 (Doc. 80 ) and the accompanying Judgment (Doc. 81 ) are VACATED. Petitioner's case is REOPENED. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is GRANTED. The Illinois Department of Correction shall conduct a rehearing within 120 days from the date of this or der on the Petitioner's two disciplinary reports, or in the alternative, restore Petitioner's one year of lost good time credits. The Court DISMISSES AS MOOT Petitioner's remaining motions (Docs. 87 and 89 ). The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter FINAL JUDGMENT and CLOSE the case. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER & OPINION. (JS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER & OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 12/20/16. IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 1 is DENIED. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. Petitioner's Motion to Stand on His Original Petition and Traverse is GRANTED. Petitioner's outstanding motions 57 and 62 are DISMISSED AS MOOT.CASE TERMINATED. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER. (FDT, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER & OPINION Entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 6/16/2016. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Petitioner's Motion to Expand the Record and Stay Brown County Proceedings 61 is DENIED IN PART and RESERVED IN PART. The Court will not stay the Brow n County proceedings and will determine whether it must expand the record after considering the Petition, Respondent's Supplemental Answer, and Petitioner's currently pending Response. In light of this Order, Petitioner's Motion for Status 66 is FOUND TO BE MOOT. See full written Order.(SL, ilcd) Modified on 6/17/2016 (SL, ilcd).
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER & OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 10/16/2014. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 1 is DENIED. The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. CASE TERMINATED. See full written Order.(JS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER & OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 03/05/2014. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Reconsider 11 is GRANTED. The Order dated February 18, 2014 9 and the accompanying Judgment 10 are VACATED. Petitioner's case is REOPENED. Petitioner SHALL pay the five dollar filing fee within twenty-eight days of the date of this Order. See Full Written Order.(JS, ilcd)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER & OPINION entered by Judge Joe Billy McDade on 02/14/2014. Accordingly, Petitioner's case will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Despite multiple orders and warnings of the consequences, Petitioner did not pay his filing fee or send any change of address notification to the Court. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. CASE TERMINATED. See Full Written Order.(JS, ilcd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
