Cady v. Superior Pool Products
Plaintiff: Michael Mel Cady
Defendant: Superior Pool Products
Case Number: 1:2013cv01533
Filed: November 13, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Office: Peoria Office
County: Tazewell
Presiding Judge: Byron G. Cudmore
Presiding Judge: Sara Darrow
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 451
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER entered by Judge Sara Darrow on February 24, 2016. Defendant's 65 Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff's 74 Motion to Amend/Correct are GRANTED. The case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's 100 Motion for Status is MOOT. No further claims remaining, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment, and to close the case. (SC, ilcd)
October 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 98 OPINION by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents not Produced by Pool Corp., LLC. In Response to Judges Order on First Motion to Compel Discovery Order 86 , Plaintiff's Motion the Court to Grant Plaintiff to File Two Motions to Compel Under Sealed Ordered by Court 88 , and Defendant's Motion to Strike/Seal and for Sanctions 90 are DENIED. See written order. (LB, ilcd)
March 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 66 OPINION by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Plaintiff Michael Mel Cady's Amended Motion to Compel Production 59 is ALLOWED IN PART, and his Amended Motion for Extension of Discovery Deadline 60 is ALLOWED. Defendant Superior Pool Products, LLC, is directed to produce the additional documents by 4/17/2015. The discovery deadline is also modified to give Plaintiff Michael Mel Cady an extension of time until 4/20/2015, to subpoena documents from the Illinois Department of Employment Security. See written order. (LB, ilcd)
November 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 50 OPINION entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Tom Schanzle-Haskins. Plaintiff's Motions to Quash Service of the Subpoenas Rule 45.07: Protection of Persons Subject to Subpoena 32 33 34 35 36 and 37 are ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part. On or before 12/19/2014, the entities served with the Subpoenas are directed to provide certain documents. See written order. The Subpoenas are otherwise quashed. (LB, ilcd)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cady v. Superior Pool Products
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Mel Cady
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Superior Pool Products
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?