Manzanales v. Tilden et al
Pedro Manzanales, Jr |
Illinois Department of Corrections, S. Godinez, R Ojelade, Wexford Health Sources Inc., A. Motteler, G D Pierce, R Pfister, Terry Arroyo and Andrew Tilden |
1:2014cv01265 |
July 1, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
Peoria Office |
Livingston |
Jonathan E. Hawley |
James E. Shadid |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MERIT REVIEW OPINION entered by Chief Judge James E. Shadid on 8/15/14. IT IS ORDERED that: 1) The Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed in its entirety as repetitive of the claims already before this court in Manzales v Tilden No. 13-1532. 2) The Plaintiff must still pay the full docketing fee even though this case has been dismissed. The agency having custody of the Plaintiff shall continue to make monthly payments to the Clerk of Court, as directed in the Court's prior order. 3) This dismissal shall count as one of the Plaintiff's three allotted strikes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g). See Lindell v. McCallum, 352 F.3d 1107, 1109 (7th Cir.2003) (suit is "malicious" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915 i f it is intended to harass or isotherwise abusive of the judicial process); Pittman v. Moore, 980 F.2d 994, 99495 (5th Cir.1993) (holding that it is malicious for a plaintiff to file a lawsuit under the in forma pauperis statute that duplicates alleg ations of another pending lawsuit). The clerk of the court is directed to record the Plaintiffs strike in the three-strike log. 4) If the Plaintiff wishes to appeal this dismissal, he may file a notice of appeal with this court within 30 days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). A motion for leaveto appeal in forma pauperis MUST set forth the issues the Plaintiff plans to present on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(C). If the Plaintiff does choose to appeal, he will be liable for the $505 appellate filing fee irrespective of the outcome of the appeal. SEE FULL WRITTEN ORDER. (FDT, ilcd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.